|
|
|
|
Welling Mathematics Ancient technology ·
A major portion of my research has come directly from ancient
cultures archaeological findings. The findings point to philosophies,
languages, mathematics, sciences, engineering, technology, and equal to
modern or in most cases far beyond anything we can imagine even in the year
2011. Part of the reason is large religious movements which point strongly
too “knowledge is evil”, while other parts of the society have no interest
what so ever in having anything to do with advanced technology. ·
There are times when the population does not want the best and
brightest, they want “someone I can feel comfortable having a beer with.” Some
of the other common phrases are “I want to be able to have a conversation
with my leader, without feeling stupid.” The population,
when those societal swings occur feel intimidated. The leaders who are
the smartest, best, brightest, most intelligent, etc. are only tolerated during
very specific social swings. Other than those specific swings, the population
wants to feel comfortable and be friends with their leaders. ·
I am reminded of “Black Jack” Pershing; once he was freed of
the bounds holding him back, he rose to the highest rank possible in the American
Military. Equal only to the Posthumous rank given to
George Washington in circa 1900s. Both were given the equivalent of a sixed
star. Rising up through the ranks, for Pershing was close to impossible. The structure
of the military at the time was seniority not skills or talent. So incredibly
capable and skilled leader of men was denied promotion for almost the entire
first part of his career due to the societal structure. But freeing from the
bonds of the society and army was not possible. Same goes with advancing technology
in the societal polarity swings. ·
The same people who have no interest in advanced technology
are profoundly interested in the fun and achievements they can obtain from
the use of the tools which come from advanced technology. ·
Societal swings nothing new; o Another monstrous point
to make about the subject of advanced technology be
that advanced technology part and parcel with something ancient we have no
idea about or something bran new; there are times when a society gets conservative
and wants nothing to do with anything new. That new being anything outside
their comfort zone. ·
Societal swings nothing old; on the flip
side of the a societal swing. When the society
swings back the other way, the society wants nothing old. Everything old is
not wanted, useless, and is usually thrown away. New is wanted, needed and
desired with the old being so “passé”. ·
Societal swings are not good in either aspect.
Something is left behind in both cases. The nothing new; the society does not
invest in the future. The negative side to a society not wanting to invest in
the future is; the society which does not invest in technology will be passed
by. The negative side of nothing old is; “those who forget the past or destroy
the past. Are doomed to repeat the time investment, sacrifice, and money involved
with the old. Having to rebuild, reinvent, recreate, etc. the old after it
has been destroyed. ·
·
Most technology the western world has been developing for the
last 100 years has been at least generationally on the drawing board since
the early 1820s. Computers, interactive hand held computers, phones, portable
music, etc. was all started on the drawing board when the last bit of the Roman
Empire collapsed in 1806 and the collected knowledge of the entire roman,
Greek, Aegean, Canaanite, Indus Harappa, Egyptian, UK, and Kaern library was
opened to scholars. ·
o § “This vase is made of hard stone, yet is round and
smooth like it has been turned on a lathe, while this is impossible for our
modern technology, especially to make the interior, due to the narrow
opening.” This vase is not possible to be
crafted today. No modern technlogy can recreate this vase. We can come up
with semi-approximates but our semi-approximates would take far longer than
it took to create this fine vase. Long enough that the cost effectiveness of
this vase is prohibative; and we would use modern machines. Even with modern
machines the cost is still prohibative. § § http://www.altarcheologie.nl/ ·
By time o 50,000 § o 45,000 § o 40,000 § o 35,000 § o 30,000 § o 25,000 § o 20,000 § o 15,000 § o 10,000 § o 9,000 § o 8,000 § o 7,000 § o 6,000 § o 5,000 § o 4,000 § o 3,000 § o 2,000 § o 1,000 § o 500 § o 0 § 00 § 10 § 20 § 30 § 40 § 50 § 60 § 70 § 80 § 90 § o 100 § 00 § 10 § 20 § 30 § 40 § 50 § 60 § 70 § 80 § 90 o 200 § 00 § 10 § 20 § 30 § 40 § 50 § 60 § 70 § 80 § 90 o 300 § 00 § 10 § 20 § 30 § 40 § 50 § 60 § 70 § 80 § 90 o 400 § 00 § 10 § 20 § 30 § 40 § 50 § 60 § 70 § 80 § 90 o 500 § 00 § 10 § 20 § 30 § 40 § 50 § 60 § 70 § 80 § 90 o 600 § 00 § 10 § 20 § 30 § 40 § 50 § 60 § 70 § 80 § 90 o 700 § 00 § 10 § 20 § 30 § 40 § 50 § 60 § 70 § 80 § 90 o 800 § 00 § 10 § 20 § 30 § 40 § 50 § 60 § 70 § 80 § 90 o 900 § 00 § 10 § 20 § 30 § 40 § 50 § 60 § 70 § 80 § 90 o 1000 § 00 § 10 § 20 § 30 § 40 § 50 § 60 § 70 § 80 § 90 o 1100 § 00 § 10 § 20 § 30 § 40 § 50 § 60 § 70 § 80 § 90 o 1200 § 00 § 10 § 20 § 30 § 40 § 50 § 60 § 70 § 80 § 90 o 1300 § 1310; speculative FreeMasonry starts in Northumberland UK. o 1400 § 00 § 10 § 20 § 30 § 40 § 50 § 60 § 70 § 80 § 90 o 1500 § 00 § 10 § 20 § 30 § 40 § 50 § 60 § 70 § 80 § 90 o 1600 § Speculative FreeMasonry is renewed and refreshed with the previous
300 years half erased; the Grand Lodge of Enland
starts. . § 00 § 10 § 20 § 30 § 40 § 50 § 60 § 70 § 80 § 90 § o 1700 § 00 § 10 § 20 § 30 § 40 § 50 § 60 § 70 § 80 § 90 o 1800 § 00 § 10 § 20 § 30 § 40 § 50 § 60 § 70 § 80 § 90 o 1900 § 00 § 10 § 20 § 30 § 40 § 50 § 60 § 70 § 80 § 90 o 2000 § o The next leap ·
By cultural influence o o Old Stone Age o New Stone Ag o Ancient Near East § Mesopotamia § Indus Valley
Civilization § Levant
/ Canaan § Bronze Age Anatolia / Aegean o Bronze Age Europe o Bronze Age India o Bronze Age China o Africa § Ancient Egypt § Kush § Axum o Pre-Columbian Americas § Norte Chico / Caral § Olmec § Zapotec civilization o ·
By region o ·
|
|
|
|
|