week 9 dq 1

3 major challenges to researching cultures.

The scientific method says nothing about emotion and or emotional concepts. However, just because emotion is not supposed to involved with science, does not mean a thing when it comes down to it. Scientists based on a lifetime of experience are some of the most insecure and narcissistic people around, second only to politicians.

The three main challenges to researching cultures are emotion and quantum physics based.

First is HUP; Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle is one of the more difficult aspects in physics to understand. It has more than a few meanings, it also has applications across all aspects of science/mathematics. I have seen a couple different formulas which prove mathematically that 1+1=3. The equation is based on the concepts and ideas that the 1 and 1 remain independent from each other at the same time (Schrodinger’s cat) are combined into the 2. Like a child is an equal division of DNA from parent A and parent B. A thing in the child remains independent, B thing remains independent, but at the same time the C child is still very much in existence.

An object being observed is by default changed by said observation. when observing something, that object will be default change based on said observation.

second is observation bias; I can go deep and detailed into this subject, but I will attempt to keep it brief. This exact subject and observational bias is how I cracked the mystery of where Wilhelm Wundt was when he was writing the notes which became the book which field is based on.

The books Wundt used primarily were the books of “The Classics” which is a collection of stories which began circa 1330 bce in the years previous to the official start of the Trojan War. The Trojan War did not start at Troy, nor did it start at Athens, it semi-started with Theseus at the Palace at Knossos battling against the Minotaur. Which is mostly solid situational bias, since the enemies of the trojans hated the very idea of telling an accurate story of who they were and what they did. You see there are about 3 to 10 different versions of the Iliad, each one specfici to the audience it was intended for. Some are intended to be performed as plays for the masses to get the masses used to “sacrificing for the greater good of the community” eg collectivism. Other stories are for mid level managers and low end military officers who use the technics to keep the infantry well motivated and ignore their friends being killed. The top stories are designed to present strategies techniques for the rules and military leaders to read and study to find the best ways to manipulate the situation to convince their army that going off to kill people is actually a good and justified act. The foundation of Psychology itself is based on information which has operational bias built in. In truth the culture Agamemnon built to go genocide the Trojans, had no foundation for the war, the fiction of Helen being married to Menelaus and Paris stealing her has less than zero basis in reality. That would be like the head mufti of Islam’s brother being married to Netanyahu’s daughter. Situational bias, just because the story says x does not in any way make it correct.

three not being able to assess what is being observed. Not long ago I was reviewing the inventions of Leonardo Da Vinci, something I have done religiously since I was a small child. My mom purchased his book when I was still in diapers and I have thumbed through that book on enumerable occasions. In my teens I studied space flight. But it was not till a few weeks after Notre Dame burned in April 2019, that my mind finally connected the dots to strongly suggest a connection. So I created a document where I took the drawings leo did, and compared them side by side with the actual working space flight tools. Statistically they are more than 95% similar, some a tiny bit less 90%, some are so close they are like “ok good luck convincing anyone those are not almost exactly identical”. For the last more than half a millennia, almost if not everyone has missed the facts that Leonardo laid the foundation for Space Flight inventions. Van Braun simply started with Leo’s work and expanded it a bit for his rocket programs.

This subject is a bit different from situational bias, being taught x is truth when x is pure fiction is ever so different from having evidence directly in front of you and not being able to see the connections or connecting something which are in fact two entirely different things. Another example, the Vatican as punishment for a wide variety of crimes, sentenced both Michelangelo and Leonardo Da Vinci in the last 1400s to a historically harsh thing. Leonardo would paint the ceiling but force Michelangelo to take the credit. A second after the painting was finished Leo was expelled from Italy informed “do not ever even think about coming back”. For the last 500 years, the general public have simply believed what they were told to believe about the events, and did not even think about questioning the situation.

Although the second and third do have a lot of cross over, they are in fact two very different categories. It is ignoring evidence from different reasons and different neuropathway processing areas of the brain.