week 9 dq 2 response

For me when I look at the current policy of immigration, I do not see the behavior patterns most others do. I see cognitive dissonance controlling the behavior pattern of the authority figures present. If you observe the court documents and the like, the last surviving member of the prosecution team at Nuremberg has declared in his more than 70 years as a professional legal expert opinion said actions are a crime against humanity. But when the participants performing the actions are questioned, they start to create “fill in the gaps” answers under oath. The reasons they are performing the actions and the under-oath answers are in fact wide and mostly made up after the events to back fill in why they did what they did.

This is quantitatively and qualitatively solid and substantial evidence of a cognitive disorder. Where the actions are based on some other want, need, desire, etc. that has caused problems and violent actions. But why is not really going to be solved putting the officials in a congressional or even legal proceeding. Since the people performing the actions have literally little to no conscious idea why they are doing their actions. Sending asylum seekers back to their home countries because the individual does not possess sufficient documentation evidence they will be killed shortly after they arrive back home. This is part of the excuse smart people who are suffering from cognitive dissonance back fill in to cover the real reasons they perform said actions. Most of the time they have no idea why, so they make up a story as close to legal as possible and run with it as if it is the truth when in al hard reality it is clearly not.

So, the point to mathematics is to find out why the individuals are performing and/or why the culture they belong to needs to perform said actions. In at least one event I read about on fb, a man stated as a matter of hard fact during his US hearing that he would be killed the second he returned to his country of origin. But since there was no documentation of said real world threats, the court said “I do not believe you”. He was deported, he was killed before he left the airport. His death certificate was sufficient evidnece to show he was in mortal danger. All the officials wanting to deport him were in the paraphrased “is it not my fault for sending him back, the burden of proof was on his side, etc.”. It is becoming obvious with the 1000s to 100,000s of repeat pattern cases that it is not about border security, it is about something else. Something else has this culture in direct cooperation with other cultures that is in effect wanting these people to be taken back and either punished and or executed. It appears based on the evidnece the goal is to have the execution but not the guilt associated. In a paraphrased concept “how is it my fault that when I sent x person or group back to their home country, their home country executes them. Exactly how am I guilty of a crime when I did not pull the trigger.” Now add the physical evidence of the lynching’s in the south, before was slavery where killing some of your slaves was not a crime, killing natives and free blacks was also not a crime, before witch trials, previous gladiator contests, previous defined and undefined genocide. It appears an extremely well documented application that European cultures have a draw to perform ritual human sacrifices in some type of religious devotion. Name me a single current official/politician in charge of either the legal portions and or the law enforcement who is not a hard core born again fanatical religious person. Each of the 5 examples over the course of 2500 years the core motivation is religious in nature.