Class 1 week 2 dq 1

I have been doing research long and hard enough that selecting a correct article has become not only second nature, but in a I have created a list of things to look for when authors are trying to convince themselves and me that a façade is correct when it has no weight.

Flowerly words,

Overblow explanations

Sentence which are purposely too small and as analytical as possible. You spent so much time trying to fill in the gaps that you forget there are no gaps to fill in.

One example of a large collection of articles and books which have all but zero basis in reality. Any article and or book which places the Pyramids and mummies together, at the time of construction. Every single one of those books and articles has no basis in scientific structure. I have asked this next question to about 50 different nworking Egyptologists. Each and every one of them gave me in basic the same answer; “I cannot answer that”, most have refused to interactd with me, a few blocked me on fb, but one we have continued to chat bt very little.

In 2500 years of working and digging archaeology in the pyramids. Not a single molecule of evidence can be taken to the laboratory and tested which places a mummy in any of the 120 exampels of pryamids. At the point of construction. HOwver more than 1200 years later, a dozen bodies were buried in. but you can place most o the entire Roman Empier in that whole between construction finished and a person’s death. This has no bassi in reality.

No evdeicne, than it did not happen. It is pure peer reviewed propaganda. Most of the field of history is also based on propaganda. The amount some govnermnts lied is staggering, and modern historians eat up their propaganda as if the opiiions of people who were disgusted by who they were wreiting about had weight.

Now on the other hand an article which has a great deal of validity to it (Gundlach, H. (2018). Although this article is about the mythologics regarding the actions and events which occurred to push William James away from Medicine and towards what would become the field of Psychology. The amount this and all connected authors of this subjcct are entirely ignorant of shows through with huge gaping holes. This article is actualy funny to read because I can fill in the mistakes the author and the other authors which proceeded this author in trying to understand how James got into the field of Psycolgoy. I know what happened. Not to James but with Wundt, this artles in its opening synpsos flat out states in several paraphrased was “I have no idea what happened”, all I know is what the end result was. What the author is unaware of is that Ohio and Hiedelberg in all hard reaity both Heidelberg Univeristies (yes there are two; one in Ohio Tiffin to be specific, and one in Germany/Prussia) the hard facts that there is no record of James being in attendance at all for three years points to he was likely not in Prussia but in Ohio. He was attending Heidelberg Univeristy Tiffin Ohio. The actual birthplace of Psychology. There is no real reason to assume Wundt from 1844 – to when the Prussians let him out of his indentrued servant contract that he did not go back and forth between Prussian and Ohio several times. Look for records at Hiedelberg Tiffin Ohio for either James and or a John Doe pseudonym at the time James was attending in Ohio. Faking paperwork is one of the things the Prussians were the best at.

The story of the founding of Psychology is actually much much more elaborate than even I knew of and I have dug deep into it. My stats equation all but proves Wundt was in Tiffin Ohio when he was writing his first notes.

But on with a trustable peer review reference.

It is a proven fact that the 100^th monkey situation is not only real but it is how some species learn and grow on a quantum physics level species wide (Shoup, A. 2013). In basic the syndrome was set up on very remote islands in the south pacific. 1000s of miles from the nearest nothing open ocean.

Extremely remote areas. A researcher was reserahcing a group of monkies, after a time one of the prefessionals began to develop a report with one of the test subjects. That repour led to some type of an interctdion over food. A monkey got some food, but it was so covered in sand it was not edible. So the researcher got the monkyes attention, and took out a piece of his own something and washed his piece in a body of water. The monkey figured it out and took his sand covered piece of food to the water and washed it off. Removing most of the sand, which allowed the eating without the issues. that monkey taught his collection of monkies the trick, and from then forward they as a collection of monkies began to wash their food in water. A long enough distance away on another island, impossible in the time period for a monkey to swim. The monkies of that island began to suddenly wash their food in water, out of no where. This explains the phenomon, when a movie, or entertainer, or a new gadget, song, etc. is introduced to the collective. It is instantly loved, hated, or ignored. This is the humans repeating on a selectvie species wide scale to wash their food in water.

Shoup, A. (2013). MONKEY HEAR...MONKEY DO How Far Are We from Our 100th Monkey?. Audiology Today, 25(2), 48-53.

Gundlach, H. (2018). William James and the Heidelberg fiasco. History Of Psychology, 21(1), 47-72. doi:10.1037/hop0000083