Interesting connection Caesarian dies and Jesus Christ is born

 

According to standard rules of protocol; which Augustine would have and did follow. Augustus did not execute either Cleopatra or her son Augustus half/set/adopted brother Caesarian. He would have allowed them both to live in exile; most likely in Northumberland.

 

How long Cleopatra lived in the UK is an unknown; but if she was 37 when she went into exile and add 30 years. That would make her 67 years old.

That would also make her son in his middle 50s. Both were Roman Citizens, connected to ancient Pharaonic lines. Alexander himself was from an ancient Pharaonic line. Possibly Jacobs line from the old kingdom.

Now if you add 20 to 30 years; time for Jesus to grow up; that would place Caesarian in his mid to late 80s. his mother in her mid to late 90s. A more realistic time for one or both to die of natural causes.

Which would explain why Jesus Christ waited so long to start his ministry; he had to wait for one or both to die in order to claim the title of pharaoh.

When in exile; your motions and said are watched carefully. Making more babies does constitute a threat; for either Cleopatra and or her surviving children.

 

 

They did not attack him; so he had no recourse but to not attack them. They were threats, but you exile threats; you do not include the wrath of deity by executing, Unless they are actively attempting to harm you.

 

 

Since neither Cleopatra nor the young Caesarian were trying to attack; he had no recourse but to exile. Of course for her detractors execution was the only option. For those that favored her; exile was the only option. So he would have let those that were her most adamant supporters he was going to simply exile them.

 

So in a way Jesus Christ was born to be the next pharaoh of Egypt at approximately the same year or time when Cleopatra either died or was supposed to die.

Although Jesus did spent years in Egypt; living in Memphis, under the protection of being not only a Roman citizen, but also the defacto undeclared next pharaoh. Which would have earned him the standard Pharaonic names.

Making Jesus Christ only one of his five names.

 

Brings to mind the concept revolving around the idea; of after the crucifixion, Jesus would have emerged as defeated death. Making him all but untouchable from a Roman Empire standard.

Which could be one of the reasons Augustine and his step son altered the entire framework of the Roman empire to erase said laws and restrictions; to truly execute the direct threat to the power of the Roman empire

Making it also possible one of the apostles after the crucifixion in fact(possibly) the new name/title of Jesus.

Since Jesus would have had (if this line of thinking is correct) five names after.

 

Brings a whole new concept revolving around the idea of Simon Peter; one of the names could have been Simon peter. The sound of the Rock; of which to build my church.

 

Since the NT was written by Esau line descendants, edited by, compiled, disagreeable material burned by, voted on, etc. by Esau line descendants the information is from a strict Esau line descendant point of view.

Many of the uncanaanized books paint such a vastly different picture of the life and ministry of Jesus Christ; same words just removing offensive portions. Although last I checked; if god wrote it, he did not intent to have portions removed. Talk about arrogance; removing/editing gods words because you do not like them. Of course Moses set this precedent during the Exodus slavery of the Jews when he destroyed gods library to destroy a symbol of Jacob.

 

Jesus was born at about the same time the Last Ptolemaic pharaoh died; symbolically replacing himself as the next pharaoh.

 

 

The year Tiberius died is approximately the same year Jesus started his ministry.