Feedback
Journal: Graduate Writing II
Name: Welling T
Week
1: Feedback Preferences
What kind of feedback
would you like to receive from your instructor? On what aspect of writing would
you most like to receive feedback?” TYPE
YOUR ANSWER HERE
Dealers
choice,
should
not include “I did not read the instructions the same way you did, so marking
off not based on merit of the written word but marking off based on what the
audience is expecting.” I am so not a fan of that. Complete unclear
instructions. Completely unclear rubric.
Although
I did say dealers choice, so maybe punitive grading is
the OC tool employed to force a longer more detailed response. All an OC is
going to do is usually sit with the pain and get annoyed with the situation.
Blocking pain is something as a handicapped person you are forced to get used
to.
4
weeks of class left. Lets see how this next week does.
already thinking about the “well I will likely just have to pay to take this
class next time”. Since existing writing skills do not count.
How
do you give me solid feedback, not using Skinner Box (OC) techniques is a good choice. All it will do is annoy me.
Use
this journal to record the writing feedback you receive. Please update and
submit this table by Day 7 of Weeks 2 through 5.
|
Piece of writing (title,
description, etc.) |
Area where excelled |
Issue to work on |
Resources to review |
Plan for revision / future
writing Optional:
Questions
to ask the instructor or the Writing Center |
|
|
2019 11 30 |
history |
Technical writing |
Too long, incorrect
packaging for different audiences. |
The guild structure
|
Continue to study
history and different aspects of the Memento Mori human nature condition. |
|
12 7 2019 |
history |
Technical writing |
Too long, incorrect
packaging for different audiences. Differences between how I read the
instructions versus the demands of my audience. |
The foundation of
academics |
Be very much on
guard regarding the illusions of “but the instructions were totally clear”.
Not everyone reads the same paragraph the same way. Ignoring those facts has
caused more problems in communication can be measured. That is something to
think about. |
|
12 9 0916 |
history |
Technical writing |
Too long, incorrect
packaging for different audiences. Differences between how I read the
instructions versus the demands of my audience. |
How academics are
funded; usually through financial and or religious benefactors who want
career academics to draw specific conclusions in their papers. References provided |
The audience has to be always in mind when writing anything. Some
audience groups have differing expectation bench marks.
When writing, carefully crafting the writing to the audience sometimes is an
absolute requirement. Not unlike writing for academic boosters; although most
teachers are much less nefarious in
there =x demands. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.