Week 11 dq post

Alignment and Social Change

In this last week, you bring your skills in critically evaluating research to a final discussion of what it means for the components of a research study to be logically connected. As you recall from previous weeks, this connection refers to alignment.

You also consider the social change implications of research. Engendering positive social change is at the core of Walden University’s mission. As future researchers and scholar-practitioners in your fields, you have likely had, and will continue to have, opportunities to apply your Walden learning experiences to making a difference in the lives of others.

This week, you will revisit the interrelationship among research components to determine the criteria for evaluating alignment. You will also consider the relationship between research and social change as you reflect on your newly acquired research knowledge and skills.

Learning Objectives

Students will:

Determine criteria to evaluate alignment of research components

Describe role of acquired research knowledge and skills in advancing positive social change

Apply APA Style to writing

The last 10 weeks have been a fascinating journey. I learned things I was not expecting from sources I was surprised could reveal said types of information.

This weekend after I finished the homework for the week I continued to work on my research. In that research I made a very interesting discovery.

I found the Hebrew character of shin as a foundation architectural base for cities to be built from. I found shin as the founding architecture for about a dozen of the oldest western culture cities in existence. London, Paris, Florence, Rome, etc.

Mathematics, to measure too and from fixed points. How did I know the character of shin was built into “specific” cities foundation architecture. By using a predictability engine. You will find these 4 points and 10 sub points in key (Key buildings are the absolute key to the algorithm) locations with specific laid out roads leading to and from each of the 4 locations but not directly connecting them.

Three in a semi straight line, but just off center similar to Orion’s Belt, and the connecting roads in the shape of the Aten with a dog leg leading to those 4 points. When you can predict the pattern, that is scientific validity.

Where I found the pattern is in 10 places 8 of which are theological so unacceptable in a secular class setting. But using that mathematics I applied to places like the Khufu Pyramid and the Giza Plateau which matched to the mm.

Then applying the mathematics of the Hebrew character of Shin to the city of Rome. The Pazza del Popolo, Forum specifically the Temple of Romulus (which is directly next to the temple of Caesar, which is just behind the Arch of Augustus), Temple of Jupiter, Vatican. The points stood out and hard. I was able to predict what I would find architecturally when I looked at the most key buildings of the city of Rome. It is very difficult to find more important building than the ones listed. Of course the Hebrew Character of Shin can be found in about a dozen locations inside the city of Rome Proper and just outside. But that starts to turn from archaeology and architecture to theocracy eg the Vatican. Topographically the Vatican used to have a Hill were the Basilica now sits. The Land has been called Vatican since ? well before Agamemnon was born 600 years before Romulus was born. The buildings have different names because the land has had a name since likely the Old Kingdom of Egypt was still in power 2600-2100 bce. Everything in science is about studying enough to determine what a things repeat sequences are. So that if you gather enough material you can predict with x level of certainty what the thing will do next.