week 2 dq response to the teacher

I am sure my classmates are performing in good faith to the homework. but I have a fundamental issue with the provided materials as to how to conduct research.

I do not know how to respond or even make comments which would not be seen as anything other than inappropriate. Not trying to in any way.

For this week I would simply write something about the methods of research I work form as a follow up and in effect do not mention what they wrote at all.

However, that being said, I have a great deal of knowledge regarding how polytechnical institutes work and most of the information provided by the resources from this school would be laughed out of any presentation. This is not how these tools are used.

I spent most of the last class working on taking an idea about the Pyramids of Egypt, I did a graphic arts thing, it was suggested to me to do another thing, which after a bit of work I proved the suggestion completely valid in all aspects, then did a google search of twin headed gods and found Janus instantly, making the Pyramids of Egypt and the schema of Rome is the same exact subject, etc.

Helps that they share an identical meaning over a couple different languages. Now the really interesting part is the Temples of Janus and of course Memento Mori. From which hidden research Freud and others found in the old Holy Roman Empire library in their respective areas of influence found the books, mistranslated them, and presented his ideas from mistranslated materials.

The ceremony of Memento Mori itself is in part the foundation of an event which took place just shy of 2000 years ago. However there is so much more happening and going on than just these few subjects. The Qualitative and Quantitively evidence from those events tells a very interesting psychological story. I can define and describe the existing definitions for