week 4 response to teacher

One of many issues academics have is the notion regarding what does my audience want to see. The audience in most cases is not the general public but the “peer review board”. What key points are individual members looking for in any given paper they read.

In many ways academics has a built in “group think model” format as its foundation. If you agree with the masses you succeed, if you do not agree with the masses you are not welcome. No matter how great your evidence is, does not matter at all. Example if I said something like the story of Romulus and Remus has the structures of two very interesting things built in, three groups of academics would by default fight with everything they had against the physical evidence.

The Memento Mori Ceremony is built into the structure of the founding story. Either Romulus killed his brother Remus (very likely where the Dome of St Peters is in the present, or the man Remus killed some unknown (unidentified brother) person, at the defined location, and changed his name to the Janus Romulus.

Which if you add grammar and linguistics to that structure, there is a location, a right-angle triangle from the Temple Mound and the Cave of the Nativity which uses the Arabic “Ancient Romans were called "Rūm" or sometimes "Latin'yun" (Latins) in Levant Lands”. Let us focus on the Yun part. Take the Y and R and the N and M part. Through a dozen language changes and acceptable vs. unacceptable per the 50 cultures which operated from those 12 languages. There is a grammar wise very clear inconsistency with the name Rome and Rune. The Rune or Runes are the language the Vikings used, although in all hard reality, the Vikings used the language, but it was not their invention. Changes the dynamic of most of the history of Rome, Egyptology, the descendants of the Hyksos culture (which the Roman Culture is absolutely a Hyksos descendant culture), the Trojan War, the Vikings, the Rune aka Elder Futhark, Janus of course, etc. most of what we know about those subjects the groups which study those topics would have a strong reaction against despite the fact the evidence is overwhelming. But group think rules in the “peer review process”.