WK2Assgn2 Welling T

The feedback I usually get is first wow, and then that is really really complicated. In my current book, I am actually going to need to spin off at least 5 sections of it into separate books. Which is interesting since this non fiction book itself is a spin off from my work on Notre Dame, which itself is a spin off from a series of books about WWII.

I view history as a series of interconnected gears. Example a doctor in an O.R. turns to the nurse and says “scalpel”. The nurse hands the doctor the instrument. Since the scalpel is just a blade, it does not need much of any additional explanation. However if the doctor gave a different command, say “McBurney's medical procedure”, that is a complex sequence of instructions and movements to achieve the continued biosynthesis of the patient. That will require explanation.

In history you cannot just say “and Hastings occurred at 1066 just off the shorts of Dover”. The War was intensely more complicated. The back story of William needs to be included, the back story of the Ogle family also needs to be included, the aftermath, the Crusade's, the End of the Age of the Viking, the Constantinople Library, FreeMasonry, etc. the gears of that event comprise enumerable other situations which occurred before, during, and after. Hastings lead directly to the start of the Crusades, which led directly to the original Notre Dame building being obliterated and a new one built in its place. The old building was a Synagogue directly tied and built by the descendants of the Trojan Royal family.

My feedback is usually. Your information is too complex and detailed. Simple it down a bit.

One of the spin off books from my work on Leonardo Da Vinci is my discovery of the fact that the Pyramids of Egypt with some technical stuff and descriptions form the double spine of the city of Rome Proper deity of Janus. One Spine facing east, the other facing west. Simplifying my work means that you can only guess at what I am talking about. Now if I added the 5000 plus words to explain in very brief details each of the major points. You would have a far greater understanding, but that makes 5100 words. Sometimes simple is just babel. My work is not for the 10 word sound bite crowd.

Go to google earth, use the ruler tool to draw a line from the very middle 0000 of each pyramid from the farthest north about 3 miles north of Giza, start there, draw a line to Khufu, then Khafre, then Memkaure, then dot, to dot, to dot, till you reach the Bent Pyramid. Screen capture that image using the snippet tool. That odd connect the dots line from mid back up facing east is one spine, from mid back down facing west is another spine. The Causeways are the major nerves branching off the spine. That is the simplest of examples, why that is the spirit of Rome Janus. What is Janus. The city of Samhain, has about a dozen little explanations inside of it. Leo was an expert in Medicine, todays first 3 entire years of Medical School starting with Gross Anatomy came directly from his drawings and written instructions. He wrote the textbooks, which were translated into other languages. If Leo had any connection to books about the Pyramids at all, he would have seen the double spines. I can go on for pages and pages of information, to fully explain those few dozen words, which out of context have little meaning. I can physically connect Leo to both Versailles (which has a grammar explanation which will blow your mind, impossible to disprove) and the Vatican, why that is important Janus.

Explaining these little points to you has helped me, I have found 2 ideas inside of this explanation. Well three but that was from the previous assignment. Leo was a living embodiment of the Alexandria Library. Killing him was in effect burning the Alexandria Library for a 5^th time. The Janus part I saw the single spine, but not the Siamese twins of Janus. That input came from a person I talked to about my work. I did not see it, I built the graphic in the hour she was present. After that hour she was proved to be completely correct. Minus her input, the Janus part might not have been found.