• The war Canaan versus Monotheism
• Tower weapon (know how to use)and arc on way to Egypt
• No Tower weapon (or tower weapon, unable to use it) arc on way to Egypt; running from the Canaanite’s the entire time. Good place to hid from attacking army mountains of Sinai. No tower weapon or tower weapon unusable would need the arc.
• No tower weapon, weapon of unknown origin in the kings chamber great pyramid (used on the Egyptian army; used on way into Canaan. Used on the Canaan army to win), arc on way into Egypt. The Egyptian unknown weapon used on Egyptian and Canaan army’s different than the arc. Kept in same or similar place.
• Adam
• Kicked out of Tabriz
• Adam and his priest and children Start attacking
• 1;27 god made man not humans but man; and sent them out to be fruitful and multiply.
• 2:7 god took one man and blessed him making him human. Adding the English Hu e.g. soul to the man. Enter Adam
• Adam/Zoroaster
• Adam lived in a tent city near present day Tabriz
• Tabriz tent/tabernacle city
• at the earliest came off the glacier around 5000 b.c.e since the entire area was still tundra till roughly 2500- 1000 bee. Archaeology is difficult to track if everything is frozen. Unless the item becomes trapped in ice itself, that thing will just become a cold and frozen pulverized nothing.
• Lilith
• Adams first wife. Adam rejects her for unknown reasons. Put a psychological map around the stories left behind and it starts to fill in a very dominant man who does not like the idea of his wife being better in any way to him.
• Lilith might not have liked hi reaction and left him. Turning from him to study the cycles of nature and mathematics further. Since it was a descendant of Adam who wrote her bio; there is plenty of biblical evidence to point to his first wife was unacceptable because she was better at math and science than he was. All the jobs of which Lilith is accused of each one requires a high degree of both math and science to achieve.
• Eve learns about the science of the shadows
• Adam reacts rather harshly (possibly domestic violence. With a reaction of “how dare you teach me this. That which blessed me does not want anyone know such things. For that is the !!! purview of god and god alone. <which this archetype character application leads directly to the same phraseology within the framework of the tower of babel contained knowledge and wisdom god did not want man to possess. At least not yet.>)
• It is possible that Adam felt all such knowledge was of the purview of blessed man and men alone.
• Adam starts to be even more openly hostile to his fellow kingdom of Canaan citizens.
• The base of the war starts
• Cain
• The first cities the monotheists build, or take over
• Cain to Abel
• Cain “Help me I need help with a good sacrifice to the lord.
• If I can do a good sacrifice then maybe god will be less angry with mom. Maybe we can get mom out of trouble with the lord.
• Abel why would I want that. She did the crime she deserves the punishment.”
• What follows is a standard reaction of anyone insulting the favored parent. The oldest had to defend the honor or his beloved mother; against attacks against every aspect of not only her but of the talents and character of the child who takes after the mother. So if this scenario is even partially correct; able might have given both Cain’s mother but Cain the largest and most intense insult imaginable. In some current Arab, Turkish, and India cultures the eldest son is duty bound to demand reparations from anyone of a lower hierarchy position than himself casting that large of an insult again more than one member of the his family.
• A large interaction between brothers and siblings. Siblings work out the differences and major issues their parents have; by continuing the same fights as their parents. Abel was clearly a daddies boy and Cain was clearly a mommas boy. Cain was talented in the actions of the math and science his mother was good at. Abel was good at figure out how to herd animals. Adams main skills were not with raising plants but with tending the animals in the garden.
• Kingdom of Canaan versus the Semitic (Expand or reference other aras. The war, how the war started Fighting the war. Centures before they attacked the city of babble.) tribes
• As stated previously in this paper. The war which began sometime around the point where Adam took his first tentative breath as a human being (according to legend, myth, and cultural understanding) all the way to and including the time the southern Semitic army and culture were running into the Sinai from the combined forces of the kingdom of the Canaan. From roughly 5000-2(7)500 b.c.e.; which is a very long time to conduct a multicity and multisided war.
• The war cry started in the north just south and east of the lands between Tabriz, Iran and the couple hundred miles east and south.
• The constant war between the Semitics and the kingdom of the Canaan raged almost nonstop from the point of the emergence of the Semitics and or their predecessor culture down through the millennia to the start of the middle ages.
• The Semitic armies of the tribes of Abraham were large and strong till the romans conquered them.
• From the Romans till after 1945 the Semitic tribes of Abraham only had a partial army.
• The Semitic tribes of Zoroaster and then Mohammed have almost always had strong fighting forces.
• Not always armies; but strong fighting forces.
• So just because one mega battle took place does not mean by any stretch of the imagination that only one battle was being fought.
• There were several tent cities with both large armies and huge ziggurats with large numbers of scholars at other tent cities.
• Eridu was just one of several ziggurats.
• Every tent city complex had educational facilities; not many with multistory libraries and education complexes.
• The (Need to devine this more)large ziggurat educational structures in select tent cities were designed to perform the same task then as they do right now (as referenced in institutional memory; what a population wants, they either bring with them or they reinvent the product in the new governmental structure.
• Making small changes to accommodate for the unbending parameters of the new dominant paradigm governmental structure.
• more than one tower of babble war was raging.
• The ziggurat is the same natural byproduct of converting the tent city structures to rock permanent installations.
• Every tent would need to be taken apart or made permanent.
• Consequently almost ever ancient city had some kind of arboretum; large enough to support the city which built it in a tent.
• In fact according to newton’s third law and almost all large scale “kill them all” wars which have been fought on many fronts.
• When an army finds a technique the enemy is vulnerable too, they use it over and over again till the enemy develops sufficient defenses to counter the attack.
• By using the same battle plan at similar times; not only will confusion be created by the enemy’s response. But
• The same battle plan is used against many targets; not at the same time but in similar times.
• If this is true than the tower of babble battle would have had other similar battles raging all over at virtually the same time.
• A list of similar battles to the tower of babble battle
• The city of burnt and other Indus cities were also sacked about this same time 2800-2600 b.c.e. although the burnt battle is not close enough. The battle plan was to keep the tower up and intact; not burn it to the ground. but then of course maybe those strings of battles did keep the tower untouched but later conquests of the city destroyed the tower.
• If a battle plan worked once it will work again later in history.
• The Hyksos as the Egyptians would label them were strongly in Anatolia/Hittite/turkey lands almost the entire time from 2200-1400. The Hyksos (tribes from Asia. Who also introduced as soon as they had sufficient power with a pharaoh the concept of a single god “etin”. Doing away with the polytheism of the previous rulers “Ra”.) Ruled Egypt 2000-1400 strongly. From 1628-1200 the entire Anatolian and Aegean cultural power structure was under attack from almost all sides. Which coincidentally; those are similar dates to
• The details of the battle plan
• The details of the battle plan have come down through history with striking similarities. The first part is basic warfare; the basics of scouting the defenses of the enemy looking for weaknesses to exploit. But while the defenses are being scouted a large amount of attention is being directed at items most conquerors would not care about. The libraries, scientists, priests, etc.. how Do I know special attention was directed at the priests, educational institutes, the scientists and such. Because of both sets of actions which occurred after. As well as both sets of actions which occurred toward the next city of similar academics and scientific parameters. Patterns of behavior are patterns of behavior. If most scientists and priest are killed; why would the examples listed have a marked difference and the priests and scientists treated upon routine differently than any other citizen group. Marked differences in treatment of a two (not leaders) special groups in the conquest is an almost complete marked difference between every other conquest battle plan used almost every single time culture B conquers cultures A. why the radical difference in treatment of those two subgroups.
• The plan is outlined as follows
• Large force
• Hide the large force in any way the culture being attacked would not find a threat
• Get as many inside the defenses as possible
• Scout as much of the defenses, as possible.
• Defenses include
• Location of all troops
• Rounds and routines of all the troops
• Location of all weapons
• Location of government officials
• Location of the rulers of the city
• Location of all important merchants
• Offensive capabilities
• Etc.
• Scout into the libraries,
• Scout scientists
• Scout religious leaders
• Scout religious areas;
• For example
• Location of all holy places, from the family worship areas to the places the leaders conduct their ceremonies
• From small to large scout them all.
• Scout the location of all advanced devices and weapons
• Attack; (of course the above is standard battle conditions of any conquest. Learn as much as possible and exploit weaknesses. But the differences are; the scientists, advanced technology, etc. scouting being as important as the royals and troops.)
• Once the attack order is given both inside the walls and outside the walls attacks occur close together.
• The conquest is successful. With the conquering army successfully avoiding burning down key areas. Libraries, advanced weapons, etc. those are not only not touched but the scientists are kept alive. They are usually easy to kill they are almost always the first of the civilians to be killed. They try to defend their city and research but are no match for battle hardened troops.
• What happens to the scientists.
• The scientists are almost to the battle not only left alive but are a special target of cruel but not lethal behavior.

In both major conquests of Athens the scientists were singled out and sent off to prison. Their weapons were confiscated and either destroyed or the scientists were forced to teach the conqueror how to use the weapon. The conquest by the Poseidon’s they used the weapons. The Athenians also used what the Dorian's did not destroy. The Dorian's were only interested in destroying every piece of advanced technology they could find.