The Bandura’s bobo doll experiment.

This expariments presented evidence which appeared in the early 1960s to be conclusive regarding children and aggression. However as the questions involved point out, what are the limitations. The limitations of this sequence of expariments are as difficult to understand the equation parameters as the Milgram Studies.

The parameters of the equations, themselves are very limited, and draw conclusions in the equation which do not exist in reality. Forcing square pegs into round holes, the outcome is not actually determinable. Example if the peg is 1 cm wide, but the whole is 5 cm’s wide; the size and shape of the peg is completely irrelevant. Cultural bias is built in. We assume as adults that the peg and whole are relatively the same size. However this is the same assumption equation error found in Milgram.

Just because you can get people to “kill” someone else does not actually bring to a conclusion what the equation points to. Yes, you can convince people/children to perform x duties, hitting bobo, or electrical shocking; are not that different from a variables perspective.

This is similar to the concept and structure of the IQ test, IQ tests their basic mathematics are all based on the same exact parameters. The Prussians and the French demanded to know who in their populations would be best suited for what factory ro support jobs. Who would be good at sweeping the floor, working the line, supervising small portions of the line, supervision areas, etc. up to the CEO. Which also includes support personnel who bring in supplies and take the created products out. The basics mathematics of all three have huge flaws which have not been addressed by later studies.