week 10 dq post

I wanted to follow up with a better explanation. My aim in attending walden is to start a think tank, I have a ton of research which must be organized and worked with correctly. Academically that requires a think tank. I do not fit in Maslow’s hierarchy, I chose walden phd program because masters degree programs at other schools did not offer enough flexibility in their curriculum. This program is designed to go from the Bachelors to the PhD. Although I have more than 20 credit hours at the masters level at other schools, it became inappropriate to continue at the other schools. I have an end goal, that end goal requires a lot of sacrifice. But waldens program also allows me plenty of time to work on other ideas.

Example thanks to decades and decades so study. in the last 48 hours I have devolved an entire theory based on collecting about 1000 different facts from different areas and assembled them into one cohesive thought. A more controversial thought is very difficult to come by. But the facts are the facts. Hence the need for a think tank.

All of the other psychology programs which are offered on line are so heavily devoted to the subject of counseling, that they are not bendable to anything other than teaching students to obtain their license. Including one on line grad school which is so fanatical regarding their licensure schema that they have no problem breaking federal rules with fafsa to keep focused on their licensure program. You have to sign a federal document which states emphatically this is a research degree not in any way prep for a license to counsel in psychology. But the teachers ignore that flat out and demand the homework to written as licensure prep. Two of them were actually offended when said legal paperwork was brought up.

I have less than zero interest in a license, my interest is in a research Ph.D so I can found a think tank.

Which is actually a lot more difficult than it sounds. Legally it is a mess and a half, the ideas and research is the easy party. The organizational structure is intensely difficult on a good day.

My hierarchy of needs is not well covered, I am more than willing to give up on things which others would find completely unacceptable in order to achieve goals which a not small percentage of humans would find odd to say the least. I have little if any problem sitting in my office for huge periods of time to work on my ideas, but for me going to a barbeque is close to torture. I also almost entirely dislike sports, so it has no interest for me at all. Food, Shelter, etc. for me is a differnet list them most of the population. The next steps are also different and out of hierarchal sequence. The Heirarchy in most cases does not apply to me. Nor does it apply to people that are like me; admittedly not a huge portion of the population, but still a portion non the less.