week 7 dq response 2 Lauren Doran
Shall we involve the
police, my point exactly. The A and B persons could be anywhere from 5-18 years
old. There is less than zero way to tell in the way the question is worded.
Just one of enumerable reasons I am not a fan of behaviorism. It gives the battlefield
medic the illusion that they have the skills of a FAC member board certified
general surgeon. 18 months of training get a license and you have the power to
do lasting violently nasty damage to your clients, because you think you know
more than you do. And the field of Psychology backs you up.
This week’s assignment is
to give a treatment for a situation you are given about 1% information for.
When in truth; the question should be “define these terms”.
I have a Bachelors in
Psychology and 35 masters level credit hours in the same. If I cannot define
those terms what am I doing here.
Classical conditioning terms include:
UCS (unconditioned stimulus), Pavlov noticed that when
creatures eat they naturally begin to salivate. He wanted to find out if he put
a sound before hand if he could get the creature to repeat the behavior minus
the food. It worked. There are a lots of things which creatures react to
naturally, or unstimulated.
UCR (unconditioned response), the natural smell of food
starts the biological reactions to said stimulus. Hunger, salivation, etc. come
naturally.
NS (neutral stimulus),
a response in a given creature which does not produce a single “dependable”
biological response, but it does get the creatures attention.
CS (conditioned stimulus), an event occurs like the need to
eat, ring a bell before the creature eats. The sound will cause the creature to
have hunger and eating responses.
CR (conditioned response). the good old Pavlov response. Ring
a bell and the dog/s will salivate. Most notably seen in recent years with
“hear your cell phone ring and the person is automatically by nervous system CR
forced to salivate/pick up their phone”.
Operant conditioning
terms include positive reinforcers, and negative reinforcers, and punishers.
OC; the best example is the Skinner Box, do what is demanded or face a larger
amount of punishment than if you do what is demanded. You are going to be hurt either
way, but the amount of “pain” is increased if the demanded task is not done
correctly. Positive reinforcers are living, eating, escaping, or other things
the creature wants. Negative reinforcers are the pain which must be experienced
in order to force the creature to comply. Punishers are the if the negative
reinforcers do not work to the satisfaction of the tester.
I am so not a fan of these tools used without a full and
complete understanding of them. However jumping to treatment seems to be the current
wave and acceptable response in the field. I on the other hand want to create a
think tank, and perform research.