Western Academics


The structure of where academics comes from answers most of those very dominant and “my way or the highway” organizational structures behavior patterns.

Modern Academics comes directly from the structures of academics post the renaissance.

Renaissance academics comes directly out of the guild structure.

Guild structure system comes directly from how the Vatican itself is organized.

The Vatican is a direct organizational copy of “imperial Rome” (a noted difference between Imperial Rome and the roman republic), which is loosely based on the organizational structure of the Greece city state.

Imperial Rome was based on the Hyksos/Dorian organizational structure.

The Hyksos/Dorian organizational structure were interested in suppressing any and all information they did not believe in or could not control. Innovation, inventions etc. are either accepted or rejected based on if the leader or leaders can find a way to profit off the idea without losing power.


Second the progress of the great library  system, undermines the authority of the powers that be, and does foster innovation.


The Hyksos/Dorians are not interested in furthering ideas, they were interested in the control of information. Academics is strongly in the business of controlling information not fostering a prosperous and bountiful ideas and information are all welcoming environment. Unless you have a spirit willing to brass knuckle box and defend every word you use when presenting your ideas in academics; do not bother.

A dissertation is to defend yourself to a panel of piers in that field who are there to tear you and your ideas apart.

The idea is, if you can stand up to basic scientific criticism, than the idea actually has merit to be taken seriously. But that is the dream fo the format. In reality, how the dissertation process actually works is, if you get a nasty or two people on the board whom are only interested in keeping all applicants down. No matter how good the argument, they will not agree. For instance if you have a dissertation on how wrong Dr Boule’s work was, but you have a Boule’ devotee on the panel, do not bother trying to answer that persons question. No amount of evidence will be acceptable.