Academic code of conduct violation Walden

The professor has chosen to take his position in the class to the ultimate degree and is trying to get me expelled for his own mistakes. Me pointing out his mistakes and his own self-admitted "limited understanding of English" and is trying to create a huge issue out of it. Which is itself a violation of several core rules of Walden itself.

This is not my first horror story teacher. Although it is my first at Walden. This is not my 6th gross horror story teacher.

I have no idea what his problem is, but apparently I am being reviewed for expulsion.

I would like to file an academic code of conduct violation against this teacher for the following charge. Being entirely unclear in all ways as to his parameters for as he pointed out at least 3 times in 80 hours, 20 of them were Sunday before the class started.

He refused twice (once in the open class and the other privately) to answer his most basic parameters for what "proper formatting he demands". Respectfully the code of conduct states if there is a problem, it should be handled privately e.g. the provided email.

He charged me with an academic code of conduct violation at some point Tuesday. Ostensibly for hurting his feelings for the one question I asked in the "ask the teacher" section. I asked him to clarify exactly what he meant by "proper formatting". He replied back "I screen captured the entire exchange" two questions minus answering my question about formatting. what is tech and what us UOP. Tech is a very upper end poly-technical school in New Mexico and UOP is another on line university.

He replied to another student Tuesday with a "thank you for properly formatting"

At which time since he had ignored the "contact the teacher" question. I sent him an email at Waldenu.edu asking the same question. with the "ok it appears we have a problem. let us solve it now." then asked two questions.

1 do we have a problem

2 what exactly do you mean by "proper formatting". stating if you have specific parameters it is your responsibility to provide that information.

He took the greatest offense and charged me with harassment for pointing out he had not answered the question.

He took my discussion post and turned it into an anti-Semitic comment about a historical figure. Which less than zero of said is true or have any foundation in reality. One and only one email in 48 hours of official class time and he calls that harassment.

Then invents a charge of being anti-Semitic. Which I could not find more offensive at all. His action of accusing me of antisemitism is violating me. Charging me with being anti-Semitic is itself a violation of the student code of conduct. The post was about a historical figure who was both a bastard and statistically he was a Jew. Which at that point in history those two things were either very bad to capital crime depending on the decade. His self-admitted limited understanding of English caused him to act in an abusive bullying and code of conduct violation manner. Stating facts in a stats science class, that sentence cannot be seen as anti-Semitic unless you really, really try hard to twist it that way.

I was going to let it go, because insecure teachers lash out, it is just a code of conduct violation which has to be simply ignored. Not unlike a person who stands up and screams to make themselves feel good and important. Since he has turned my reaction into a federal case, his at least 3 violations of the academic code of conduct itself gets reported.

Refused to answer one question 3 times.

Refused to communicate in a nice and community beneficial way. Which is a violation of about half a dozen core Walden principles.

Was too language limited to understand what I wrote and took it as bad as possible reacting by making an unfounded code of conduct violation.

TR Welling 00991352

PSYC - 8202

Survey Research Methods

INSTRUCTOR

02/24/2020

05/10/2020

Academic code of conduct violation Walden

This is not my first horror story teacher. Although it is my first at Walden. This is not my 6th gross horror story teacher.

I have no idea what his problem is, but apparently I am being reviewed for expulsion.

He replied to another student Tuesday with a "thank you for properly formatting"

1 do we have a problem

2 what exactly do you mean by "proper formatting". stating if you have specific parameters it is your responsibility to provide that information.

He took the greatest offense and charged me with harassment for pointing out he had not answered the question.

Refused to answer one question 3 times.

Refused to communicate in a nice and community beneficial way. Which is a violation of about half a dozen core Walden principles.

Was too language limited to understand what I wrote and took it as bad as possible reacting by making an unfounded code of conduct violation.

T Robert Welling

00991352

T Robert Welling 00991352

I am pointing out new information received after my first complaint letter, a #metoo code of conduct violation. He can come back as long as he is respectful, which is code for inappropriate Ds interaction.

I did not receive the following till after I asked for your email in which I asked "am I about to be expelled".

3 days of a nightmare, where the legal limit of information was sent to me. There has been extremely little community support.

Despite the facts that I predicted this exact situation to the letter 2 years ago with 10 email exchanges with

I did not know the name of the instructor who was going to react to me badly, but I predicted this letter for letter (minus the anti antisemitic accusation) conflict 2 years before.

7 really good teachers, one horror story.

I was informed after I asked if I was being expelled "he is welcome back into class". Which I Had less than no idea of that previous to circa about an hour or less ago 2 28 2020 1442 pst. However once a teacher violates the students close to everything, there is no going back from that.

I have no interest in having a class with a teacher not interested in teaching but interested in being inappropriately in a metoo way dominant over a student. The pleasure of dominating someone is still a violation of the metoo situation.

It is obvious based on 5 days of behavior patterns that the following situation occurred ,

an insecure teacher with extremely limited English comprehension skills from an extremely dominant patriarchal culture. Which has a self admitted (i can think of 10 words the Mexican culture has invented specifically to insult and degrade white culture.) inadequacies were focused on "respect". Repeated several times in the exchanges we did. a total of 5 e exchanges and respect is mentioned 3 times. Sociologically speaking his use of the word "respect" and "proper formatting" hints at his feeling inferior to a strong obviously white named first and last named person. His version of "proper respect" is that white culture v brown culture, which should have zero place in academics. He based on his "harassment" charge evidence he felt attacked, eg his own self admitted white person versus brown person conflict response. Which is a pure illusion in his own head.

This situation is a Dominant submissive metoo problem. The #metoo movement connotations absolutely apply him to me, which is in itself a violation fo the student code of conduct. He turned this own insecurities into a #metoo violation.

Which itself is a violation of the student code of conduct.

I will have to think long and hard if I want to come back to a teacher being allowed to have an inappropriate #metoo Ds relationship with a student, the problem is the joy and pleasure in the forcing the s part. A normal teacher student does not involved that kind of joy and pleasure. But his constant respect mentions and of course "follow my rules to the letter". But in all ways refusing to provide specifics as to what his interpretation of the "proper APA" formatting is the inappropriate pleasure and joy part. He wants us to "guess", and be punished if we guess wrong. The pleasure in the punishment is the #metoo part.

I doubt he is aware of his actions are like this. I can easily find case studies of how the Mexican culture even in the 21st century still has problems with #metoo awareness. I have less than no problem with any cultural rules of order as long as they do not violate/assault me. As stated in the previous, I would have simply ignored his issues if he did not make a huge code of conduct violation case out of it. Do not throw the first stone, type fo deal. Things are ignore able till things get real, he pushed it real, his own conduct must be reviewed.

TR Welling

00991352

clarify post

To be entirely, thoroughly, and in all ways completely clear.

There is every difference in the world between appropriate in classroom teacher student emotions, joy, happiness, etc. and inappropriate teacher student emotions, joy, happiness.

Obviously, a teacher enjoying the success of a student is not a #metoo violation. In fact, it is a good and healthy thing.

The teacher in question his actions are in all hard reality not this kind of good and healthy emotional, joy, happiness behavior patterns. His actions are not about success but a reaction to enjoying punishment. His reaction time from zero to full on academic code of conduct violation was less than 40 hours from the starting minute of the class. Add the 24 hours of Sunday and the 10 hours Wednesday morning, there is not enough time to have developed any type of real classroom issue. The problem is his self-admitted low English comprehension which in 5 exchanges in the classroom he admitted 4 times.

He obviously reacted badly and had to “get even” by violating the academic code of conduct to regain (to seek pleasure) from spending the next 11 weeks disciplining me, for the obvious #metoo Ds power structure. He submitted a code of conduct violation over a less than zero real world problem, which he used to make a huge deal over his feelings of insecurity. Assuming based on our extremely limited interaction. I could not have pushed his buttons enough in that short of time to produce that type of response. He was looking for something to punish me over. Me being a random victim, not personal. His attack was not personal, his attack was all in his head. I just happened to be the easiest target for his need to violate a student or a group of students. His extremely limited understanding of English was amplified to the max degree since I use more than one language in my posts. What I pointed out 1 is a historical fact, 2 is a statistical likelihood but since this class is Survey Statistics, this week was specifically about “what problems exist”. My posts were about situational bias. which he actually agreed with me, was a huge problem. Before he deleted my and his posts. His teaching and cultural bias proven beyond doubt through his code of conduct #metoo violation. Agreeing with me just amplified his insecurity from the questions he asked in the “ask the teacher” portion. Where he had to ask what UOP was and tech was. Embarrassed and possibly humiliated, he reacted well outside acceptable parameters.

Seeking pleasure by forcing submissive behavior, which according to the DSM is listed in the alt intimacy section e.g. kink. Which is entirely different in all ways, shapes, and forms from a good teacher finding joy in positive and good success-oriented teacher student dynamic. The two are entirely different in all ways. The form of joy, pleasure, happiness is entirely different healthy v violating. His pleasure based on the actions presented in just 60 hours are derived from conflict, domination and forcing his students to be submissive. Forcing submissive behavior is the #metoo violation part. His form of forcing submission is his definition of “proper APA formatting”, which has about a million different definitions for what is proper formatting in a classroom. That vague and misleading “proper APA formatting” punishment is his #metoo pleasure tool. He uses it to gain pleasure from students, which has zero to do with teaching and all to do with violation.

I can restate this a few more times, but that might get repetitive. There is zero wrong with a teachers joy over student success, there is everything wrong with joy over seeking ways to punish students to gain power and control over them.

T Robert Welling

390 920 5597

00991352

I am not autistic (classical definitions) nor am I asbergs. However I am on the spectrum, so I have a question. Are people on the neuro a typical spectrum in effect predator bate? 7 teachers we interacted fine and dandy, only a couple mild hick ups. Are neuro a typical people predator bate? do we attract those who will exploit our inherent social issues for their own #metoo gratification? Seeking ways to punish us for "not bing like everyone else", and getting away with said pleasure seeking through punishment by the package of "proper formatting", and the classic "respect" .

T Robert Welling

390 920 5597

00991352

the behavior patterns are consistent.

#metoo teachers using grading etc to seek pleasure from their students. seeking inappropriate pleasure by using an authority tool eg Grades and the threat of academic code of conduct violation threat to keep students in line and afraid to do anything the teacher does not like. Not all teachers, on the extreme side of obviously. but the one in say 100 or more who take pleasure in hurting their students.

Something to seriously think about.

The evidence said behaviors exist are obvious, however the question becomes what can be done about it

T Robert Welling

00991352