culture bio

Hi class, my history is complex. I am 48 years old, married, no kids. My plan is to obtain my PhD to start a research think tank. Some of my ideas have already produced vast amounts of evidence regarding the subjects of neuropathways/neuropsychology, ancient languages, historiography, cognition, cultural, lifespan, etc.

This will be my 5^th grad school attempt. I have not failed a class; the teachers and I have personality issues. I like and base all of my ideas on the scientific method, the mathematical order of operations, and the application of facts. I am not a person who likes to rehash theories which were discounted years, decades, or a century ago. Learn a bit about them, but if their mathematics is mistaken what is the point to the theory. Trying a proven incorrect theory again and again has a DSM definition.

Hence my focus on Historiography, where Wundt and James were to learn about the field of Psychology is nowhere close to where academics has accepted, they were. They were not in Europe at all. Although there were decades between them the location was the same. Same where different went. Wilhelm Wundt wrote the book which William James, Lightner, Mary Calkin, etc. purchased ;they founded the Psychology department at Harvard, Penn State, and the APA from that book respectively. Without those four people, this class would not exist. But the notes for the book were not written at Heidelberg Germany. They were written at the other Heidelberg. The teenage Wundt had help with his translation work from 2 men in their 40s. However, most of that evidence and facts is entirely unacceptable to both academics and the rather not very nice army in charge of those 3 plus about 20 more men’s lives. Two of which were indentured servants to that army. The library they were translating the books from belonged to my ancestors previous to 1840. I do not mean 2nd cousin 5 times removed I mean great x and y grandfathers. They owned the library previous to it being seized from them. All those details make a lot of the studies in psychology invalid. The details are what my think tank is diving into.