The T Shawn Welling research Web Site

 

 

 

 

 

 

The

T Shawn Welling

Research Web Site

On and about

Symbolic Science Erdology

 

www.tswelling.com

 

All information contained within this site copyright © 1989-2004

 

Last updated

 Wednesday, January 19, 2005

Under construction while research lasts. Check back daily

Volunteers

 

 

 

 

shwelling@tswelling.com        shawnw24@yahoo.com

 

 

 

 

 

Store

 

 

 

 

 

Research facility

 

 

 

 

 

Canaanite bible

 

There are several things going to be discussed in this section. Among the topics are going to be the false history I have found rampid in the way the roman catholic church organized and diseminatede the infrmaiton it was responsible for not only gathing but also teaching to others.

 

So this is actually a large part of my research although until this great debate in the United States of America on and about the concept of Creationist Science.  Well I have my own 2 cents to add to the debate as to not only the validity of creationist science but also the validity of Symbolic Science and Symbolic Science Erdology. 

 

Now do not get me wrong, I thouraly do not like the concept of creationist science, I think it has so many errors that it can not be taken seriously at all.  The only way to take creationist science seriously is to become a biblical/religious/archaeological/sociological/history buff and review all the evidence at hand of how the bible was created, how the cultures that created the bible existed and what where their motivations, how did each culture that had access to the ancient knolwdge change and alter to meet their own specifications,

 

  • Who created the bible: well in all realism the person who started the bible was
    • Canaanites: all the information from the old testament can be found in the infomariton that the anncinet Canaanites had. Although their version was intensely longer. 
    • Zoroaster: this is a very interesting figure in the history of the bible. Since his theories on and about the concept that there is only one god come directly from him.  The nice thing is that the time and existence of this man can be very closely counted by way of looking at the first people he converted to his radical idea of monotheism.  Abraham is one of his followers. And the bible of the Judaism and Christian world have the date at Abrahams convergence from a polytheistic belief structure into a monotheistic belief structure are well calculated to be in the time of 4000 b. c. e. .  which his callaberated by the monotheistic moment zoroaster created started a huge movement that started about that time to have the concept of the one god “death to all who appose us” move throughout India, the middle east, and into the Mediterranean.   Over time the conquest monotheistic ideas have spread over the face of the planet.
    • Abraham: in all intense and purposes a psychopath/psytsophrentic. Abraham could absolutely not have come up with that information simply by communication with a divine being. Since he was a member of the Canaanite popeles and the Canaanite people had remarkably similar stores, idea, and a much longer version of the same info he “origianly wrote”. Kind of blows large creadibility holes in the idea that Abraham came up with bible from divine construction when the information he wrote was commune knowledge.   What was his original ideas was to cut and edit the guts out of the original Canaanite holy books.
    • Mosis: this is a story straight out of Babylonian history, altered a great deal.
    • Yoseph bar Emanuelle Yashua Christos(what is the Aramaic word for light, I am using Greek here): better know to you as Jesus Christ: this man came up with some intensely great ideas, based on the old Canaanite teachings, the nature based philosophies of the Europeans, and balance philosophies of the Tibetans, and a bit of Egyptian concepts to balance everything out.  Although he had really good idea, his ideas where so badly altered through the course of the next couple hundred years very little of his teachings still exist.
    • Paul: this man did almost as much damage to the bible as the leaders of the Vatican in Nicea circa 325 c. e.  Italy.  This man wanted to bring the teachings of Abraham and zoroster to the Romans. And that he did, under the disguise of the teachings of a man he never met the name you know as Jesus Christ.
    • Holy Sea the holy roman catholic church: this organization created not by any desendant of the jesus Christ but those loyal to the Abraham/Zoroaster massage took the information they had on and about all the ancient knowledge of the world and edited all the scrolls and information sourcese and created the bible as we know it today. Unformation for all of us, the bible they created was so limited in its information that the information left out is substancialy greater then what was left in.  although the bible as we know it traces the path of the Abraham teachings of Zoroaster well.
  • how the cultures that created the bible existed and what where their motivations
  • how did each culture that had access to the ancient knolwdge change and alter to meet their own specifications

Canaanite Bible

When I first started this project many years ago. I woudlh ave never guessed that I would be here with this interesting bend on history knowledge.

 

But here I am.

 

What I have asempble3d in the best guess as to how the bible actually came into being.  It was s cut down version of the original Canaanite holy books.  that abrahma, moses, and the jews cut down to fit there own zarastrian ideals.

 

But that does not matter as much as what the original book was talking about.

  •  

 

 

 

 

 

For Questions or Comments

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/symbolicsciences

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/tswelling

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Erdology

 

This Site designed, built, and maintained

by

T Shawn & Emma Welling