The T Shawn Welling Web Site

 

www.tswelling.com

 

All information contained within this site copyright © 1989-2004

 

Last updated 5/24/2004 8:57 PM

 

Under construction while research lasts. Check back daily

 

 

shwelling@tswelling.com

 

 

 

 

I would like to remind my readers that this is an under construction site.  I am adding material on a constant basis each page, each branch sometimes goes months with out, and sometimes each branch gets new and updated information on a daily basis.  So please be patient my research is ongoing, and I find new and interesting things on almost a daily basis.  Keep checking back; see the last updated on the index page.  Any and all questions please do not hesitate to go to the yahoo groups listed below join and ask any question you like.   Your input has helped shape the way I present the information, and helps me to be more definite with issues in showing my work.

 

For Questions or Comments

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/symbolicsciences

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/tswelling

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Erdology

 

 

 

Symbolic Mathematics and arithmetic 1.618

 

1.618

the ancient cultures had it.

24 numbers in their sequence, I have not been able to explain until now why.  13 moon signs. The other numbers all are accounted for in their sequencing but the 13th.  In all their definitions, all 50 of them, the 13th symbol is the feminine/goddess/maternal.  Ok, all the other relevant numbers are. 1 2 3 5 8 13 21 then there is a break then you have the rest of the numbers.  The 13th does not really have a corresponding sequence. 1 2 3 5 8 and 21 all do but not the 13th.  Then I learned about 1.618, the belly button is just halfway from the floor...... and then I put 2 and 2 together. 13 drop it down to its half then double. 24. 

Why they had 1.618 everything in their sciences herbology, math, architecture, engineering, navigation, and religion all run on a 1.618 ratio.

 

Next, a couple weeks ago I was emailed by a friend, a Turkish map made in around 1520 that shows the entire Atlantic rim on a geo pattern.  As in the map is not drawn on a 2d plan, it is drawn to resemble a 3d plane.  The admiral cartographer redrew the map from several source maps he found deep in the Alexandria library which one of those maps could not possibly have been made past the 6000 b.c.e mark since that map showed the location of a section of Antarctica ice locked since at least 6000 b.c.e. 

 

The only way to get to Antarctica from anywhere is to have some serious navigational skill, as well as engineering skill, as well as a global understanding in your navigation, as well as some serious linguistics/math skills to be able to chart correctly and map correctly any land mass.  So the cultures of 6000 b.c.e could not possibly have gone there without at least a rudimentary form of science. Now that map has come under some serious criticism not because of its authenticity, but more because the researchers that wanted to prove ancient cultures had advancements did not have any idea of what those skills/sciences/math/ and or anything else that would have gotten any culture down there to map it all out.  I not only know what their math was, but I have a good idea of what their linguistics/math/religion/sciences and their culture was like.  So I can have just about show anyone in a few months when I get it written down and in a presentable format show anyone how their science, math, linguistics, and navigation worked

 

 

 

 

 

This Site designed, built, and maintained

by

T Shawn & Emma Welling