two seed line theory

Previous to a few minutes ago 2/23/2013 15:12:09

I had never heard the "two seed-line" theory. My work has nothing to do with their work.

My work is evidence based; I have no idea where their work is based from. Since this race thing is impossible to identify without a dna database which does not exist yet.

My identification of Esau is through a combination of identifiable variables which can be cross compared to each other and other variables.

Esau’s behavior patterns are easy to identify; they are a consistent list of rules and regulations “nurture” from which individuals associated with said culture behave accordingly.

Said behavior can be tracked through the application of linguistics, architecture, battles, alterations of history, what rules of a culture were acceptable before and what rules changes occurred with a conquest culture conquered, etc.

However; this website is dedicated to tracking evidence. Specific points within two seed line theory may or may not be valid; some type of idea regarding Cain’s parentage being that of some type of other worldly creature allows no aspect of evidence.

I am not saying the two seed theory does not have valid points. I am stating that the theory has several huge obstacles to overcome first; first obstacle is Sumerian and Akkadian monotheistic evidence is sketchy at best, second said behavior patterns and evidence of actions occurring between Adam and Abraham were entirely done with Indo-European language. A language Esau's line from three separate locations did their best to erase it entirely from history. Pre-Pharoanic Egypt circa 4000-3200 b.c.e , Hyksos (Esau's line) conquest of Egypt 2100-1600(including invasions into the middle east, Anatolia, and the Aegean) b.c.e., then erasing both Indo-European and Linear A in the Aegean circa 1600-800 b.c.e. Third the personality dynamics between Jacob aka Israel and Esau evidence can be found going backwards in time (emulating personality of ancestors) and forwards.

The behavior patterns of nurture can be tracked and traced through a wide variety of means; hence behavior patterns are traceable, provided those behavior patterns lead successive generations of people to build similar buildings. Or similar languages, similar rules of engagement, etc. the more said variables can be matched, cross matched, compared and contrasted with each other and control examples than this becomes evidence.

There are two distinct behavior patterns from pre-Jacob and Esau; however the evidence of human nature points to those two emulated the behavior patterns of older generation individuals. Uncles, or grandfathers from anywhere between a few generations to a dozen or more generations back

For example; if an intricate temple has the same architectural design; a statistical variable can be created which points to said similar types of temples can be logically connected as coming from a similar culture. Example 0 f architecture

Consequently the two line theory and my work might have similar points of evidence but previous to a few minutes before 2/23/2013 15:12:09 I had not heard of it; when I looked it up, I was taken aback.