week 8 dq 2 post

since taking on this class and week 10 assignment. My ideas regarding teaching have changed a great deal. Previous to this class I was totally and completely focused on building my research, now I am thinking about how to present my research to the world through the process of teaching it.

In most ways a similar headspace, in others my perspective has totally changed. For the first time in my life I am thinking in a slightly different way than I had. Same foundation of research, but my façade has altered.

Right now I am in a process of reexamining how to package my research into a different package than the one it is in already.

Some of it is in apa formatting, some is in essay, some in just classroom notes and dq posts. A lot is in webpage format to have a far better way to interact with references and cross references.

I am hypothesizing a way to show that historiography can show a link and structure to humans concept of cognititon. Eg each human being a synapse in a human species brain. Showing the evidence through a serious acaddmic type interactive website. Wikipeida but for scholars not just the way it is now. But a serious academic work. Millions of scholars over the length of time we have their work. Scann it all in, find out if there is any structure to the thinking.

Create an interactive graphic, every scholar and school in the program. Every single one. Schools can be “lobes” (metaphorically) and each person a synapse.

In the 3 d graphic, chart out each persons involvement based on a hollow earth scenario. the locations eg universities are affixed according to the globe, but instead of being around the planet innerconnected, have the connections through the planet. See what types of shapes and connections are made, via a 3d graphic showing in real time the connections.

different schools of thought, how much those schools of thought influence who and what institutions.

Example when I was at Tiffin U, and I found out that Wilhelm Wundt was in that city from about age 7-18(possibly 22) he was a linguist working next to proven he was present Oliver Cowdery. Talk about a philosophy, however that foundation philosophy virtually the entire field of psychology has less than absolutely zero interact. Including the school which that subject should be front and center in their lessons, but even that school with physical, tangible, and willing to commit all kinds of violence to promote their philosophy/ideas/theology even that school refuses to acknowledge the facts and evidence. Google Oliver Cowdery/Tiffin Ohio, the evidence is beyond clear. Then google Tiffin Ohio and Fort Ball. Same exact location (what is today German/Prussia Town which for the last few decades has had a major university right in the dead center of it) at the same exact time, immediately before the legal establishment of the University of Heidelberg. Now for additional hard physical evidence facts, as anyone in any school in the western world will tell you beyond any kind of legal shadow of a doubt in any way shape or form. It takes a bare absolute bare minimue of 4 years in the world right here and now to create a school legally. To charter that school takes not a second less than 4 years. 1840, 10 years would be the absolute smallest amount of time to create a school. Just a handful of decades previous and it took between decades and a full century to obtain a papal bull to found a school. So Heidelberg University Tiffin Ohio was a fully up and working school no later than 1840, when Wundt was 7. More likely 1835, when Wundt was 3. Oliver on the other hand was a 40s something lawyer, with an extreme linguistics background. By extreme google him and find out. Said subject is very likely not an acceptable subject in most schools. However this week we are discussing teaching philosophies, the philosophy Oliver helped create does count. Oliver being a linguist Wundt being a linguist in training. The Prussian FreiKorp who 80 years later the Munich Branch took on the name NAZI, their behavior patterns regarding “give us what we want or we will be violent against you”. There is not enough evidence in the world to show they would not have been genocidally interested in seizing control over the Ogle family library and renaming it Heidelberg U, then brought in 20 linguists to translate the data they found. What did the FreiKorp/NAZI’s want, they wanted weapons. Which is a well of course. One of their waves for WMD’s created modern Psychology.

Use the 3d website database format to trace from now backwards to retrace various and assorted academic ideas. To find different philosophies which might have been long lost to rebuild them.

The 3d image with sufficient years, decades, centuries, etc of data might be able to recreate the foundations of some of our most basic ideas. the 3d sphere graphic of information will begin to resemble the brain and the neural pathways. which said concept leads to two things, first it leads directly to the Roman concept of Genius which translated into modern academics and physics has the same definition as the Quantum field direct connection to thinking.

It also lends itself to the facts and evidence of use the same Pyramids connect the dots from the north to the south (a 3 year old’s game, connect the dots from the very center of each pyramid) makes an odd shape, that odd shape when you overlap using Photoshop from mid back down it is the east facing spine of Janus, from mid back up it is the west facing spine of the schema of Rome Janus. Which is the basis of the word and concept Genius. what is at the top of a spine, a brain. Brain, cognition, neuropathways.

Combine several of the theories about teaching and you arrive as this theory, which is a circular, those theories on teaching came from the Romans Guild structure, which in turn recombines them to recreate the Schema of Janus/Genius, which a strong academic argument can be made regarding Quantum Thinking. Now if Freud had not of done what he did (inappropriate behavior wise), he might not have made the mistakes in translating these ideas into late 1800s psychoanalysis. Looks based on this evidence he did not invent Psychoanalysis, he found it in the Holy Roman Library and translated it on the extreme side of badly.

However inside the proposed 3d graphic, take that concept and add one more idea to it.

Same connect the dots. Say a student in a class has an idea, variable A, A makes connections to the students in that class B-V. B through V variables most will do nothing with the idea. But say C person/variable does. C person takes the idea and starts to think about how A perons ideas add their own own research. means that when said is translated into a neuropathway, that is 30 variables/synapses. A fired, C accepts and fires, C chats with x person/synapse/variable, X chats with y, who chats with z about it. Out of say 300 people connected to that string of people/synapse/variables 4 connections are made. Those 4 people can begin to make a character, a letter/number. That idea from A started with just one synapse fire, now has 4 synapses, those 4 synapses connect to a couple dozen out of 1000s of people who see the idea and have no connection or interest. those 100 connections create letter and letter sequences. If those letter sequences the shapes from which those people/variables/synapses exist, if the shapes are similar than those shapes become letters.