“It is not possible to completely remove part A (giving the survey), Part B (taking the survey) bias” Those bias will color the study, the study itself is based on incorrect data, provided it has anything to do with the field of psychology. The first 4 decades of Modern Psychology are mostly fiction, with a sprinkling of facts which the political, military, and theocracy forces at play could not remove entirely.

Which brings up the most difficult part of any new class. Figuring out the part A good and acceptable answers to any given teacher, part b the ok answers which are grey area, part c answers which the teacher cannot stand. Which itself is a statistical survey (Westaby, 2006).

I used to bombard my new teachers with questions, till the survey came back mostly negative results (DeVellis, 2017). I am on the spectrum so social rules I usually have no idea they are present, forget how to follow them. The survey came back after about 30 qualitative results as “do not do that” all you are doing is annoying them (Bradburn, & Wansink, 2004).

The worst aspect, in my opinion, the number one problem is actually two things happening at the same time which work together to create huge problems. The engine of bias and cognitive dissonance questions (Krosnick, 1999).

First institutional problems: the academic community has specific standards from which information based on society is either acceptable or unacceptable. Which is an error in data collection, observational bias is cognitive dissonance regarding a refusal to process the variable x as actually either being present at all or present, but x is y. Which has a definition, Situational blindness. Where the mind of a person from A given community cannot process the facts as they are presented, and society accepting that A is A and X is actually X.

Paradigmatic shift is in part what this answer is designed to convey. You can ask enumerable questions, but if the audience cannot process the question, the answers will be, in effect, gibberish.

Example, I can show documentation evidence that every single person who has either been in the Sistine Chapel and seen the West Wall or seen pictures of said are looking directly at the entire Alphabet of Hebrew. Evidence at the ready, however just like that trial if the audience cannot process the information they can and usually do respond with anger and bitterness. The statistics of Galileo’s ideas are still mostly fiction since he did not “invent” (for a missing better word) what he found. Neither did Nicolaus Copernicus, both stole Leonardo da Vinci’s work of a century before. Statistically speaking Leo was one of the smartest and best mathematicians to ever live, he taught Copernicus at Venice for a bit. It is obvious the

man born of parents who were not married, with a mother who was statistically speaking from a Jewish background which said attributes directly present themselves within the framework of the actions of her son. Not the least is the recently proved discovery of the entire alphabet of Hebrew written into the West Wall of the Sistine Chapel, a secret hidden from the world for half a millennia takes a beyond brilliant 200plus IQ mind. In half a millennium at least a couple billion people have seen the west wall, and no one was able to decode the Hebrew present. Leo also, in effect, invented Gross Anatomy which modern medicine revolves around the lesson plans Leo wrote and drew in the 1480s.

did the calculations (he had the skills in all aspects up to and including the ability to engineer a telescope) which Copernicus then stole and published a few years later. Galileo did one of the two following. One he found the notes in the Medici library and/ or he found Copernicus’ published papers and went forward with the ideas. Neither man wanted to give credit where credit is due. Fast forward by half a millennium and few if anyone in any of those communities wants to review the facts and evidence involved. Forget that Leo knew Hebrew and was the only painter alive with all the skills needed to paint the Chapel, he was under house arrest for high treason for his involvement with the French invasion of Italy 1492-97. Part of his punishment was to put his brains to work for the Vatican but not take a single letter of credit for it. The second the chapel was finished and his blueprints for the redesign of the Basilica and Square were complete the French came down to force the Italian government to release Leo into their custody. He then disappears from history, with zero confirmed sightings of Leo in France at all from 1512-19. Minus a “Leo died today, in the kings house”. Which the King owned about 50 houses, so which one is not all that clear. Versailles also counted as the Kings house. Paradigmatic shift you cannot find many willing to open up their minds to these facts half a millennia later. Despite statistically it is impossible to prove wrong.

Example from a movie “The Dirty Dozen” a guard walked right past a rope hanging from the side of a building because he had walked that same path dozens if not 100s of times and his mind was not able to process the fact that a rope in the middle of the night was present. Situational blindness, his mind was expecting to see x so his mind saw x. The rope did not trigger a problem. Many individuals, communities, and the human society itself I can point to millions of examples of both situational blindness and cognitive dissonance regarding evidence they cannot process.

A real-world example, right now I can prove in several ways but statistically is one of them that the Pyramids of Egypt and the schema of Janus which is the Schema of the city of Rome itself are one and the same subjects. The variables which match number well over 10s of 1000s, between the Pyramids of Egypt and the schema of Janus. The entire Memento Mori Ceremony and the Gladiator games are all exact statistical representations of some ancient ceremony directly from the Giza Plateau. The problem is the mentioned communities and academics has less than zero interest or ability to accept these impossible to disprove facts. The situational blindness and cognitive dissonance is so strong the evidence cannot be processed. Trying to conduct any survey with these key points involved will produce problems in the calculations which have to be addressed first. A legal argument can be made that most current psychological studies are unethical because of the details left out. Not all that different from why physics needs HUP to balance out those questions. HUP absolutely applies to the field of Psychology as well, as well as applications from the discipline of quantum physics. Since those concepts and equation parameters govern the rules of electricity. Which is what thought is, electricity. I said I process information different than most other students (Groves, & Tourangeau, 2009).

References

Bradburn, N., Sudman, S., & Wansink, B. (2004). Asking questions: The definitive guide to questionnaire design—For market research, political polls, and social and health questionnaires (Revised edition). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

DeVellis, R. F. (2017). Scale development: Theory and applications (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Groves, R. M., Fowler, F. J. Jr., Couper, M. P., Lepkowski, J. M., Singer, E., & Tourangeau, R. (2009). Survey methodology (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

Krosnick, J. (1999). Survey research. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 537–567. Retrieved from the Walden Library using the MEDLINE with Full Text database.

Westaby, J. D. (2006). How different survey techniques can impact consultant recommendations: A scientist-practitioner study comparing two popular methods. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 58(4), 195–205. Retrieved from the Walden Library using the PsycARTICLES database.