week 7 dq second post

 

My grandmother who worked with PhDs candidates and researchers her entire working career told me that she determined there were two types of PhDs.

The first type are the test PhDs who were only able to achieve their goals through knowing how to work the factory system. Modern academics is in very large part based on the Prussian school system, that for the most part is very nasty and has an extremely bad aspects to Prussian Empire actions.

The Prussian empire figured out that the going shield wall to shield wall was a losing proposition. However, create spies to send in behind enemy lines to sow derision and dissent, it is not good shield wall versus a culture in disarray shield wall. The Prussians figured out, the harder the spies work the less and less willing the citizens of the culture are willing to go to war. Thus, move the not that good shield wall into place and the enemy culture is very easy to conquer.

Same mechanism works the same way in academics. Grad school academics is not about improving for the bad teachers it is about hierarchal structure.

The main body of the Prussian spy organizations set up in effect terror cells in specific locations. The Munich branch of the Prussian spy organization specifically called FreiKorp name changed in January 1920. The New York branch of the Prussian FreiKorp name changed to Tammany Hall. With a very small amount of research why I said very bad is easy to define.

The Prussians in general are not interested in academics, scholastics, etc. they are interested as a culture in the control of information. The possessing the ideas and technology, to turn them into weapons to seize more and more power over everyone around. In short, they need to be in charge of the earth.

The good PhDs are the opposite, are present to improve the species, improve the planet. To advance knowledge for the sake of advancing knowledge. Going forward, the key to understanding anything and everything you do in academics. Where is each person’s nature geared towards. Are they from the Prussian school of domination and control or are they true academics seeking knowledge for the betterment of the species. Most of the time since it is nature, it is not possible to say to them “your behaviors are x”. Bad idea to a hierarchical based culture, where everything is about power and positions of power.

Start your work to improve from that standpoint. Nature is the base, nature is the 0000 of behavior. If the person is an A type academics and needs control or are they a B type academic and want to improve.