The T S Welling art Gallery

a. Accurate history, there is so much to add here its hard to cover except with small pointers to some very good ideas, and then lead directly into 7 Haggalaz. But the point is, accurate history is history that tells a whole story. Not just from the side and point of view of the winner.

i. Aztecs second mound builders

ii. First mound builders different culture

iii. Machu piechu, and the desert SW cultures that had to hide and defend themselves against unknown invaders,

1. That mystery is easy to solve, just look around at what was happening to the neighbors of the Anasazi. The Aztecs where under such a sever draught in Mexico that there only choice was to go north following with gulf for food.

2. All the tribes in the desert SW, where effected by the invaders. And for further evidence that it was the Aztecs. No problem, you travel far enough east you run into the Mississippi. Well Along the entire reach of the Mississippi there where settler already there. Called the first mound builders. There are marked distinctions between the first mound builders and the second mound builders, the time frames for the first mound builders and the second mound builders matches the Anasazi, time line also. The second mound builders where highly aggressive, and death ritual peoples, turning the mounds into burial mounds instead of a holy circle or ring of earth for sacred purposes. The Aztecs then when the draught ended in there home land they went back home, just in time to reestablish dominance for the Spanish to arrive.

3. Simple answer, just look to neighbors when a situation happens.

iv.

b. Misleading history (facts that stick out because the conqueror wrote the history)

i. Study Says Medieval New World Map Is Real

THis has been a hotly contested map for a while now, there are those that do not want to believe this map genuine because it would prove that the new world was not the new world and sailors from the north knew about the new world, problem is that even leif erikson was a fraud because even he did not discover the vineland, what he did was retraced the steps of the people he baught his boat and maps from. It was stated in his journal that he past old abbandonded settlements on the northern ancient Nordic trade route that where once thriving but now all inhabitance dead, and the settlements in ruin. So even he was not the first but its easy to consider that he was the first because if the info came out there the Nordics had a trade route in the north atlantic pre 1000 c. e. , then they had to be not what the history books tell about htem.

ii.

iii. (here is where I have to put in a great deal of controversial information on and about untruths

iv. Caesar and Hitler

v. Convergence of Catholicism in Europe and its effect on the previous culture. What was lost in the convergence to Latin

vi. Etruscans and Romans what actually happened, how much of the Roman culture did they get from the Etruscans.

vii. Minoan being taken over by Mycenaean’s and then Greeks. Taking their knowledge and taking credit of it also

viii. The Jewish thing, (this is where my research gets a bit on the huge problem side, since what is appearing to have happened is virtually the same as anti Semite behavior ever since. Since the Canaanites were living and happy in Canaan when the Jews arrived.)

ix. Abraham thing, and the split that occurred between the ancient symbolic peoples and the people we know as Jews. Too much of the Jewish thing and the rune thing have to do with each other

x. Vatican, ……

xi. Tower of Babel

1. I have been working on researching ancient cultures for most of the last 10 years. I was working mostly on the theory that the runes of the ancient European world were a great deal more than history, archaeology, and paleontology lead our current culture to believe.

2. So after many years

of working and finding more and more information out about the runes and their implications to the world, I came across an article that changed the entire course of my research. I found the language Vinča, an ancient European language that has yet to be deciphered by science. For me it took about 2 hours. Since I had worked on its grand child for 10 years the grand parent was not at all hard.

3. That research into Vinča brought me to work on other ancient languages that were also unsolved. It was this thread that brings us to this page.

4. I was working on translating the Proto-Canaanite language

when two things occurred to me. One that the major ancient cultures all had a similar language base which I call symbolic. The second was that it all changed one day when instead of everyone working together there was a surge of domineering, patriarchal, militant, monotheistic, masculine dominating tribes that surged out of Africa and the southern Middle East. Instead of learning and growing and adding to the world wide knowledge base they decided to attack and destroy all the old. Unfortunately this is historical fact, not just gossip mongering.

5. After translating the Canaan language

into its original sequence, I noticed a spelling consistency. The 6^th symbol is one of knowledge, wisdom and understanding. Knowledge gained through the pursuit of active participation. This symbol is called variations of kannas, the s is about the action of that symbol, and the k and c are interchangeable and k may not have existed in the symbolic language base before most of the languages that were written in the symbolic language base were either destroyed or were translated into Arabic, or cuneiform. So the culture was called by the 6^th symbol in the Futhark sequence meaning wisdom, understanding, knowledge, and or experience through hands on education. This also caught me off guard by the sheer fact that the Tower of Babel was located within the boundaries of the Canaanite peoples. Or the people of knowledge.

6. So I do think that not only did the tower of Babel exist

as a major university of the ancient world, but it was also destroyed by the new monotheistic tribes that were not interested in the old ways. Those tribes continued to pursue their own interests and desires up to this very day with each cultures that has a monotheistic, domineering, and self sustaining impression of itself. The bloodiest of these conflicts are when 2 patriarchal domineering cultures collide into my theology is better then your theology. This may be one of the reasons that brought the tower of Babel down in the first place. A theological discussion leading to argument, leading to open hostilities, leading to war, leading to the destruction of the entire culture that had any of that old ancient knowledge.

xii. Barbarian war

xiii. Although the Barbarian wars were real,

what is not understood about them is that the Barbarian wars were against the same peoples. All that oppose us die.

xiv. When I began this project

it started because I was used to hearing the holes in my families stories, I was raised by a family that so much happened before I was born that was secret that no one wanted to admit, I got used to filling in the blanks. When I started my education I was so used to seeing the holes in family history that I just carried the same skills over to history and started to fill in the holes of our scientific history. Which I can tell you, after going through parochial history class, and thinking that I had a good idea of world history, I can tell that the amount of basic information that was left out of world and ancient history is staggering. Unfortunate for our education system. There are conclusions drawn by educators that are flat out lies but those lies are so well ingrained that they have become facts. I read in at least 6 different books that out modern civilization came from the Greeks, which is not accurate, but that is accepted. So you go with that. Unfortunately there are a number of cultures thousands of years older than the Greeks that had advancements long before the tribes that became the Greeks were the Greeks.

xv. lost 13^th tribe. The fact that Europe was inhabited and civilized for a long time indicates they had been there for quite a long time before the AEsier got there. The AEsier being possibilities of several cultures already known to the Mediterranean history. Then there is the language attributes to German and new languages are very similar to Yiddish. As well as early Jewish cultures were not as patriarchal based as when the prophet that first created Judaism. That culture was already up and running by the time he was around. As well as it could have been organized in other ways. There are so many similarities between the Israelites and the AEsier that it’s hard to put into format. But the lost tribe went north, and did that bull worship thing. Language matches.

xvi. One of the other things about this, Yiddish and German are kissing cousins as languages go. Yiddish is very ,very old. German is supposedly very young, how is that possible.

xvii. cocaine mummy

xviii.

c. Odd occurrences in history that make for odd concepts. Cultures are known by the names their enemies called them, this information is then recorded into history and presented as the facts of the case. How would anyone like it is the slanderous and often insulting name used to describe an enemy or a not all that friendly an ally was the name used to describe the entire culture. For instance what if the US was suddenly started to be called, Joe’s. Or Yank, or something equally as not nice. So I found information contained in various places to describe a culture I try to use the name they choose for themselves instead of using the bastardization name. The second point here is that there can be a lot learned about a culture by simply looking up the name of that culture and seeing what it meant to them.

i. When I was first working with the Sean Cill tradition of Celtic teaching I came upon a name and peoples with the name of “people of Karen”.

ii. When I first started this interesting journey and up to the present. The Futhark is called the runes. Well let me tell you one thing from a history point of view. The best thing to do is to call something by its proper name not call it by the bastardization fowl dis, cut down, insult of several communities. No a thing is called its proper name. The Futhark has a name it’s called Futhark not “that secret or hidden meanings thing which no one in proper society understands so there for it is not worthy of a proper name. So we will refer to it using what is sounds like to us the baying of a sheep BAA BAA. So barbar was born Barbarian eventually came about.” The Norse people have a rich tradition and well developed civilization skills. They knew how to navigate the north Atlantic without a compass. Give respect where respect is due. Call it Futhark, Now on to the second rant,

the peoples of Northern Europe sometimes are called Celts. Unfortunately this is also a bastard name. The closest I have been about to come to an actual name is the peoples of Karen No I do not know how to properly spell it.

History/ Archeology

At this point I refrenc to the history of the area and state a theoryof the actions of the itme. A conquest oritneted people maculine cultuire momarcky travel4ed around looking for naything they coupold battle, risches neww land to settle, there are lots of reasons for a cultural thatvel around so the point is not the palk about why the thing is that this could have happened. At what I would guess before the 1500 b. c. e. time periopd. At least that long because a travlewer in gremaniy at around 800 b.c.e. was traveling thoguyth that area and found a odanic rights festival that was over a 12 day periord at around yule. So To have a cultural ideantiyty and a full area wide ritual pluse a language pluse a dierfied humah takes time in a non-Mediterranean concept of civilized society to estalbiush, conservatively from nothing it takes at least 500 year s to put that together. Spo I peg it at no later in history then 1500 b. c. e. but the difficulty is that fighting styles and the weaponry and the architecture as well as there sailing craft all are very advanced so that pushes the taime skace back a bit. Since at soewehre before 1000 b. c. e. there was a well established trade ruoyttre between Norway, Iceland, and Greenland. Ok topday that is not a hard thing but the sailing time between noerway and Iceland is over 2 weeks. This is the north see even good wether its 10 foot sees and unpredictable weather patterns, and that isonly a couple months out of a year, and the trade route was more thn onece a year, the settlements where thribveing by 1000 b. c. e. so this pushes the tiue line back a bit. Taking at least a couple hundred years for a well estlbished colony to build eup enough to b3 able to even live awintere is a large undertaking which takes a coupe hundred years at least to do. This is close to the artic circle takes longer wintersa are harder, then the ships that can travel across open ocean and from point on point take time to engineer as wella s the concepts of naviogation. Being ablwet on sail across hundereds if not thousands of miles of open ocean and land succsefffuly at an island let along a settlement on that island. Takes time to learn. And setting outon the ocean and the distance between norwaya and ice land is the shortest distance, the distance between icelnad and gereen land is less then 2 weeks, ad there where settlements there too, all be it smaller, much more uinhaspitable place. And its less then a week from Greenland to Newfoundland, and new found land is only a little bit away from maine. So this brings us to the settlements in the new world as well as the concepts of the items found here. The ost dramatic is the runic Futhark monoliths all around the southwest. From Oklahoma to the rockies. Then there is the evidence of the established culture of the mound builders in the Mississippi. Which there where actually 2 different cultures. The fist was I believe to the the Nordics from northern Eurpoe. Going by the town layouts, the contruction tecknicks, the rituals, and the genetics of the peoples they were probably Nordic orgerman in desnt. The second culture was of course the Aztecs from mexico, there was a devastating drawght in mexoicop and the people abandonded there villages. The cliff dwellings appear at this stage as a entire pople are hiding berikaed into a hill side for protection. The astecs where not exactly a non warr like people, takingon piecfuill villages in the southest would have benen easy pikings. Then the astecs moved on to the este more food, and other cultures to conquer. Then they ran into the forwst moundbuilders. Who althought peuicefull cold get down and direty on the fighting skale. The cultures matched ewqueally and merged, aver the period of several hunder years the Aztecs took over since there base phylosiophy7 is of conquest and dominance the balneced cyulture of the peoplke that where there to begin with as they had done in the eastern euproioean idea where taken over my the aesuer as wqell as the Aztec. The drawght ended in mexico and the seoncd mount builders headed home. The rem,aining peops who did not fit and stayed in tehr eare they had originally took up a slightly different way of living then building huge mounds and went back to there old ways. The first people I will not give a genetic description for evn ht underdth money can not explane away genetics. Blue eyes, tall 6 foot and over, large bones, berril chest, light hair, is geneticly only comes from Northern Europe. IT is found no where else other then extremem genetic oddities, or a genetic throw back. So chy are the cherakee blond light haired bluenor light eyes and a foot taler then the rest of the native anerican tribes. Oh ya the cherakee language is also very close to the old nroicd Germanic language was well. One question is why are there not more settlements foud along the shors of the anericas. Well that actually ahs several answeres. Fist is that there has been civilizatioj here for 500 years. SO anything that could be a settlement isnbuirried underour own indistrial sprall. Second anything was was there was destroyed by het first inhabitence. There was a thousand foot tall mount in the middle of st/ louis tht was hand build that was tken down for it was in the way of the growth of the city as well as the towns folc decided that this was of ablsoutly no histicial suggnificance the loval Indian tribves col;d not have build it iven thought the ocal tribes stated that they did not build it tit was ther4e when they got there 3 houndered years before. The next reason isthat ok, in the Mediterranean in jus the past 2000 years the see has srizen over 50 feet. Cleopatras palace which was several dfeet over the water in the cairo harbor nowe sitts over 30 feet underwater. So the meditaeranain has rised so has the atlantic and nay costal settlements alon forstes unless ,ade of stone would have been swallowed and erased from history. The icelanding settlements where well out of the wtare since there was not way to get close to the water. The settlements had to be on the cliffs or on the flat par tof the rocks above the crashing waves. Pluse there is no interest in looking for advances cultures of settlements in the eastern see board in this country that date back to before eriknthe Viking. The resonas for that I will not get into. The next thing is that there is accutaly plenty of evidendce of extremely advanced cultural influence and aritcafs in mexico and south America. The reis a bayu in brazil that haaas the wreck of a ship hat went down over 1500 years ag=on but the ship is not a roman galion or a Greece vessel but it was carrying trade goods of roman style vases. And the writing is clearly a hybrid between latin and runic Futhark.

History of the gulf of Mexico, Aztecs and Nordics settlements

So what I think is that the dominant civilization in mexico was inundated with drought. So sever that they could not stay there. So they went to the gulf, and started to travel north looking for whatever they wanted, land, food, conquest, farm land, ect. So they traveled north and ran into the desert sw, and all the piecfull tribes in that area. As well as a couple of non piecesfull tribes. Which is why the apache may have been so head strong, not wanting to be conquered again.

So the call them myan, the myan traveled north following the gulf. Doing what they did best. Forseing the civilizations they encounterd to flee and hide, creating the cliff dwellers. See cliff dwellers

Since their span without horse and or roads was from the upper Mississippi, to soiuthern mexico, other races would have gotten strong enoguht to conquer them. then the Aztecs came to power. In mexico. The apache could have come to power, as well as other one time piecefull tribes then got all up and hard over being attacked, then stayed that way, or not too much longer after 1200 was the 1492

Cliff dwellers

What my theory is, I think that around 800ce to 1200 ce, there was a mighty invation of the desert sw by forses coming from the south. And that those fortifications where only needed when the major citieis like pueblo colo, and others around where desimated by invations. The survivors decided to find the most remote locations possible and hide out until the invations where over, which is around 1200 ce. Then they either went back home or where conquered by other civilizations.