|
|
|
Academic
code of conduct violation Walden The
professor has chosen to take his position in the class to the ultimate degree
and is trying to get me expelled for his own mistakes. Me pointing out his
mistakes and his own self-admitted "limited understanding of
English" and is trying to create a huge issue out of it. Which is itself
a violation of several core rules of Walden itself. This is
not my first horror story teacher. Although it is my first at Walden. This is
not my 6th gross horror story teacher. I have no
idea what his problem is, but apparently I am being
reviewed for expulsion. I would
like to file an academic code of conduct violation against this teacher for
the following charge. Being entirely unclear in all ways as to his parameters
for as he pointed out at least 3 times in 80 hours, 20 of them were Sunday
before the class started. He refused
twice (once in the open class and the other privately) to answer his most basic
parameters for what "proper formatting he demands". Respectfully
the code of conduct states if there is a problem, it should be handled
privately e.g. the provided email. He charged
me with an academic code of conduct violation at some point Tuesday.
Ostensibly for hurting his feelings for the one question I asked in the
"ask the teacher" section. I asked him to clarify exactly what he
meant by "proper formatting". He replied back
"I screen captured the entire exchange" two questions minus
answering my question about formatting. what is tech and what us UOP. Tech is
a very upper end poly-technical school in New Mexico and UOP is another on line university. He replied
to another student Tuesday with a "thank you for properly
formatting" At which
time since he had ignored the "contact the teacher" question. I
sent him an email at Waldenu.edu asking the same question. with the "ok
it appears we have a problem. let us solve it now." then asked two
questions. 1 do we
have a problem 2 what
exactly do you mean by "proper formatting". stating if you have
specific parameters it is your responsibility to provide that information. He took
the greatest offense and charged me with harassment for pointing out he had
not answered the question. He took my
discussion post and turned it into an anti-Semitic comment about a historical
figure. Which less than zero of said is true or have any foundation
in reality. One and only one email in 48 hours of official class time
and he calls that harassment. Then
invents a charge of being anti-Semitic. Which I could not find more offensive
at all. His action of accusing me of antisemitism is violating me. Charging
me with being anti-Semitic is itself a violation of the student code of
conduct. The post was about a historical figure who was both a bastard and
statistically he was a Jew. Which at that point in history those two things
were either very bad to capital crime depending on the decade.
His self-admitted limited understanding of English caused him to act in an
abusive bullying and code of conduct violation manner. Stating facts in a
stats science class, that sentence cannot be seen as
anti-Semitic unless you really, really try hard to twist it that way. I was
going to let it go, because insecure teachers lash out, it is just a code of
conduct violation which has to be simply ignored.
Not unlike a person who stands up and screams to make themselves feel good
and important. Since he has turned my reaction into a federal case, his at
least 3 violations of the academic code of conduct itself gets reported. Refused to
answer one question 3 times. Refused to
communicate in a nice and community beneficial way. Which is a violation of
about half a dozen core Walden principles. Was too
language limited to understand what I wrote and took it as bad as possible
reacting by making an unfounded code of conduct violation. TR Welling
00991352 PSYC - 8202 Survey
Research Methods INSTRUCTOR 02/24/2020 05/10/2020 Academic code of conduct violation Walden The professor has chosen to take his position in the class to
the ultimate degree and is trying to get me expelled for his own mistakes. Me
pointing out his mistakes and his own self-admitted "limited
understanding of English" and is trying to create a huge issue out of
it. Which is itself a violation of several core rules of Walden itself. This is not my first horror story teacher. Although it is my
first at Walden. This is not my 6th gross horror story teacher. I have no idea what his problem is, but apparently
I am being reviewed for expulsion. I would like to file an academic code of conduct violation
against this teacher for the following charge. Being entirely unclear in all
ways as to his parameters for as he pointed out at least 3 times in 80 hours,
20 of them were Sunday before the class started. He refused twice (once in the open class and the other
privately) to answer his most basic parameters for what "proper
formatting he demands". Respectfully the code of conduct states if there
is a problem, it should be handled privately e.g. the provided email. He charged me with an academic code of conduct violation at
some point Tuesday. Ostensibly for hurting his feelings for the one question
I asked in the "ask the teacher" section. I asked him to clarify
exactly what he meant by "proper formatting". He replied
back "I screen captured the entire exchange" two questions
minus answering my question about formatting. what is tech and what us UOP.
Tech is a very upper end poly-technical school in New Mexico and UOP is
another on line university. He replied to another student Tuesday with a "thank you
for properly formatting" At which time since he had ignored the "contact the
teacher" question. I sent him an email at Waldenu.edu asking the same
question. with the "ok it appears we have a problem. let us solve it
now." then asked two questions. 1 do we have a problem 2 what exactly do you mean by "proper formatting".
stating if you have specific parameters it is your responsibility to provide
that information. He took the greatest offense and charged me with harassment
for pointing out he had not answered the question. He took my discussion post and turned it into an anti-Semitic
comment about a historical figure. Which less than zero of said is true or
have any foundation in reality. One and only one
email in 48 hours of official class time and he calls that harassment. Then invents a charge of being anti-Semitic. Which I could not
find more offensive at all. His action of accusing me of antisemitism is
violating me. Charging me with being anti-Semitic is itself a violation of
the student code of conduct. The post was about a historical figure who was
both a bastard and statistically he was a Jew. Which at that point in history
those two things were either very bad to capital crime depending on the decade. His self-admitted limited understanding of English
caused him to act in an abusive bullying and code of conduct violation
manner. Stating facts in a stats science class, that sentence cannot be seen as anti-Semitic unless you really, really try hard
to twist it that way. I was going to let it go, because insecure teachers lash out,
it is just a code of conduct violation which has to
be simply ignored. Not unlike a person who stands up and screams to make
themselves feel good and important. Since he has turned my reaction into a
federal case, his at least 3 violations of the academic code of conduct
itself gets reported. Refused to answer one question 3 times. Refused to communicate in a nice and community beneficial way.
Which is a violation of about half a dozen core Walden principles. Was too language limited to understand what I wrote and took
it as bad as possible reacting by making an unfounded code of conduct
violation. T Robert
Welling 00991352 T Robert
Welling 00991352 I am pointing
out new information received after my first complaint letter, a #metoo code of conduct violation. He can come back as long as he is respectful, which is code for
inappropriate Ds interaction. I did not
receive the following till after I asked for your email in which I asked "am I about to be expelled". 3 days of a
nightmare, where the legal limit of information was sent to me. There has
been extremely little community support. Despite the
facts that I predicted this exact situation to the letter 2 years ago with 10
email exchanges with. I did not
know the name of the instructor who was going to react to me badly, but I
predicted this letter for letter (minus the anti
antisemitic accusation) conflict 2 years before. 7 really good teachers, one horror story. I was
informed after I asked if I was being expelled "he is welcome back into
class". Which I Had less than no idea of that previous
to circa about an hour or less ago 2 28 2020 1442 pst.
However once a teacher violates the students close to everything, there is no
going back from that. I have no
interest in having a class with a teacher not interested in teaching but
interested in being inappropriately in a metoo way
dominant over a student. The pleasure of dominating someone is still a
violation of the metoo situation. It is obvious
based on 5 days of behavior patterns that the following situation occurred , an insecure
teacher with extremely limited English comprehension skills from an extremely
dominant patriarchal culture. Which has a self admitted
(i can think of 10 words the Mexican culture has
invented specifically to insult and degrade white culture.) inadequacies were
focused on "respect". Repeated several times in the exchanges we
did. a total of 5 e exchanges and respect is mentioned 3 times.
Sociologically speaking his use of the word "respect" and
"proper formatting" hints at his feeling inferior to a strong
obviously white named first and last named person.
His version of "proper respect" is that white culture v brown
culture, which should have zero place in academics. He based on his
"harassment" charge evidence he felt attacked, eg
his own self admitted white person versus brown
person conflict response. Which is a pure illusion in his own head. This
situation is a Dominant submissive metoo problem.
The #metoo movement connotations absolutely apply
him to me, which is in itself a violation fo the student code of conduct. He turned this own insecurities into a #metoo violation. Which itself is
a violation of the student code of conduct. I will have
to think long and hard if I want to come back to a teacher being allowed to
have an inappropriate #metoo Ds relationship with a
student, the problem is the joy and pleasure in the forcing the s part. A
normal teacher student does not involved that kind
of joy and pleasure. But his constant respect mentions and of course
"follow my rules to the letter". But in all ways refusing to
provide specifics as to what his interpretation of the "proper APA"
formatting is the inappropriate pleasure and joy part. He wants us to
"guess", and be punished if we guess
wrong. The pleasure in the punishment is the #metoo
part. I doubt he is
aware of his actions are like this. I can easily find case studies of how the
Mexican culture even in the 21st century still has problems with #metoo awareness. I have less than no problem with any
cultural rules of order as long as they do not
violate/assault me. As stated in the previous, I would have simply ignored
his issues if he did not make a huge code of conduct violation case out of
it. Do not throw the first stone, type fo deal.
Things are ignore able till things get real, he pushed
it real, his own conduct must be reviewed. TR Welling 00991352 clarify
post To be
entirely, thoroughly, and in all ways completely clear. There is
every difference in the world between appropriate in classroom teacher
student emotions, joy, happiness, etc. and inappropriate teacher student
emotions, joy, happiness. Obviously,
a teacher enjoying the success of a student is not a #metoo
violation. In fact, it is a good and healthy thing. The
teacher in question his actions are in all hard reality not this kind of good
and healthy emotional, joy, happiness behavior patterns. His actions are not
about success but a reaction to enjoying punishment. His reaction time from
zero to full on academic code of conduct violation was less than 40 hours
from the starting minute of the class. Add the 24 hours of Sunday and the 10
hours Wednesday morning, there is not enough time to have developed any type
of real classroom issue. The problem is his self-admitted low English
comprehension which in 5 exchanges in the classroom he admitted 4 times. He
obviously reacted badly and had to “get even” by violating the academic code
of conduct to regain (to seek pleasure) from spending the next 11 weeks
disciplining me, for the obvious #metoo Ds power
structure. He submitted a code of conduct violation over a less than zero
real world problem, which he used to make a huge deal over his feelings of
insecurity. Assuming based on our extremely limited interaction. I could not
have pushed his buttons enough in that short of time to produce that type of
response. He was looking for something to punish me over. Me being a random
victim, not personal. His attack was not personal, his attack was all in his
head. I just happened to be the easiest target for his need to violate a
student or a group of students. His extremely limited understanding of
English was amplified to the max degree since I use more than one language in
my posts. What I pointed out 1 is a historical fact, 2 is a statistical
likelihood but since this class is Survey Statistics, this week was
specifically about “what problems exist”. My posts were about situational
bias. which he actually agreed with me, was a huge
problem. Before he deleted my and his posts. His teaching and cultural bias
proven beyond doubt through his code of conduct #metoo
violation. Agreeing with me just amplified his insecurity from the questions
he asked in the “ask the teacher” portion. Where he had to ask what UOP was
and tech was. Embarrassed and possibly humiliated, he reacted well outside
acceptable parameters. Seeking
pleasure by forcing submissive behavior, which according to the DSM is listed
in the alt intimacy section e.g. kink. Which is entirely different in all
ways, shapes, and forms from a good teacher finding joy in positive and good
success-oriented teacher student dynamic. The two are entirely different in
all ways. The form of joy, pleasure, happiness is entirely different healthy
v violating. His pleasure based on the actions presented in just 60 hours are
derived from conflict, domination and forcing his students to be submissive.
Forcing submissive behavior is the #metoo violation
part. His form of forcing submission is his definition of “proper APA
formatting”, which has about a million different definitions for what is
proper formatting in a classroom. That vague and misleading “proper APA
formatting” punishment is his #metoo pleasure tool.
He uses it to gain pleasure from students, which has zero to do with teaching
and all to do with violation. I can
restate this a few more times, but that might get repetitive. There is zero
wrong with a teachers joy over student success,
there is everything wrong with joy over seeking ways to punish students to
gain power and control over them. T Robert
Welling 390 920 5597 00991352 I am not
autistic (classical definitions) nor am I asbergs. However I am on the spectrum, so I have a question. Are
people on the neuro a typical spectrum in effect predator bate? 7 teachers we
interacted fine and dandy, only a couple mild hick ups. Are
neuro a typical people predator bate? do we attract those who will exploit
our inherent social issues for their own #metoo
gratification? Seeking ways to punish us for "not bing
like everyone else", and getting away with said pleasure seeking through
punishment by the package of "proper formatting", and the classic
"respect" . T Robert
Welling 390 920 5597 00991352 |
|
|
|